Technology | GearJunkie

Best Budget Satellite Messenger

ZOLEO Satellite Messenger

6.7/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Most Feature-Rich Messenger

Garmin inReach Mini 2

8.9/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Best GPS Device Messenger

Garmin GPSMAP 67i

8.8/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Best Voice and Text Satellite Messenger

Iridium GO!

9.3/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

$905 at Amazon

Check Price at Blue Cosmo

Best Splurge Satellite Messenger

Garmin inReach Messenger Plus

9.2/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Most Promising Cell Phone Satellite Service

T-Mobile T-Satellite Service

7.9/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Check Price at T-Mobile

See more picks

9.1

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 28 days
Message Composition: On-device options/in-app
Weight: 4 oz.
Water Resistance: IPX7
Satellite System: Iridium
Subscription Plan: $14.99 per month for annual 'Consumer: Essential' plan

Pros

Compact size and weight
Access to global Iridium satellite network
In-depth functionality
Extended battery life with reverse USB-C charging

Cons

Small screen for on-device typing
Higher initial cost

The diversity of communication abilities gives the Garmin inReach Messenger ($300) a place above the rest in the satellite messenger world, and easily earns it a recommendation as the best overall device. While having the ability to do standalone messaging is the main reason I carry a device like this, the phone integration makes everything much easier to use.

While other devices might rely on satellite communication alone, this Messenger works with your smartphone to send messages via your cellular network when it’s available, then defaults to the Iridium satellite network when cellular is not. Very slick.

The Iridium network is the most consistent coverage I’ve tested over the years, with a truly global connection that has allowed me to send messages from the high latitudes of Iceland to Tierra del Fuego.

This seamless messaging stream within the app was one of my favorite features and can be a huge boon for people who travel in and out of the backcountry. The on-device options include a handful of pre-programmed menus to scroll through via the screen. They allow you to craft messages (albeit slowly), track your progress, or seek out a weather forecast while abroad.

The compact 3-by-2.5-inch design weighs in at 4 ounces and is a sturdy build, rated to IPX7 water resistance. But unlike other devices of its size — or even slightly larger — you still get a small screen to monitor battery life, read messages, and adjust settings, all within the device.

Garmin recently rolled out a Plus version of this device that will also send images and voice — one of the biggest leaps in sat messaging tech in recent years — but you’ll need to pay an extra $200 for the privilege. That said, the process is refined, and the images are crisp. I see this as a fun new addition to the technology, but not an absolute essential.

The inReach subscription plans were updated in late 2024, with a few name changes, but the biggest news was a big bump in the number of messages the lower-tiered plans afford: the “Consumer: Essential” plan is comparable to the previous Safety plans but now provides 50 messages a month compared to the previous 10.

The plans are now all month-to-month, with prices similar to previous annual contract rates. The annual program fees as also gone, but activation fees have gone up slightly.

All this is likely an effort to make satellite messengers more appealing as the new generation of satellite-capable phones hit the market, and while the new tech is appealing, I still feel strongly that there’s a place for devices like the inReach Messenger.

With its stellar mix of on-device and in-app messaging and functionality in a compact design, you get a stand-alone communicator that will always work (even if you drop your phone).

6.7

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 200 hours
Message Composition: In-app composition
Weight: 5.3 oz.
Water Resistance: IP68
Satellite System: Iridium
Subscription Plan: $20 /month for 'Basic' plan

Pros

Budget price
Combination of on-device and in-app functions
Ease-of-use
Stout Iridium satellite network reception
Medical Assist function connects you to a medical professional

Cons

Limited on-device functionality
Cannot type messages directly on the device
Chunky compared to some other devices

Read Review: ZOLEO Makes an Everyday Satellite Communicator, Emojis and All

The best budget satellite messenger doesn’t have to be the most basic. The ZOLEO Satellite Communicator ($149) offers straightforward on-device functionality with a wider suite of options when paired with the smartphone app, building a variety of abilities for a budget-minded adventurer who doesn’t want to skimp on capability.

The Satellite Communicator offers basic messaging via the device — think SOS and a pre-set “okay” message — and then adds to that with additional options via the smartphone app that includes message composition for both sending and receiving.

Primarily using the Iridium global satellite network, the device can also send messages using cellular coverage. Like the Garmin Messenger, the ZOLEO device will default to sending a message with cellular or Wi-Fi service if it’s available, and will even receive messages if the device is turned off.

Last year, ZOLEO rolled out a new functionality I’ve never seen before called Medical Assist. This connects you with a medical professional to ask simple questions (read: if it’s serious, hit the SOS instead). This elevated capability is something that no other device currently offers, and for simple first-aid queries, I think it’s an excellent addition.

Within the simple app, you can compose specific messages — though not on the device itself. This was my main quibble with the ZOLEO device, as it can be incredibly useful in coordinating, and having the potential to lose the ability, should your phone die, is a tough sale. Luckily, the Power On button can send out a pre-set alert that lets a programmed contact know you are doing fine, which is a good addition, in my opinion.

I enjoyed the durable design of the device, the budget-friendly initial cost, and the added functionality of the app. When taken together, the Satellite Communicator from ZOLEO offers a solid entry point for someone looking for a satellite messenger without needing full on-device functionality.

If you only need the big red SOS button (and the occasional “I’m OK” message), the $150 SPOT Gen4 is my go-to for tossing in the glove box and forgetting about. But for $50 more, the ability to craft your own messages elevates this device without going overboard with functionality you might not use.

8.9

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery life: 14 days
Message composition: On-device options/in-app
Weight: 3.5 oz.
Water resistance: IPX7
Satellite system: Iridium
Subscription plan: $14.99 per month for annual 'Consumer: Essential' plan

Pros

Compact size and external carabiner for clipping to packs
Improved screen over predecessor
On-device navigation abilities (breadcrumb tracking, compass)
Lightweight at under 4 oz.

Cons

One of the pricer devices
No cellular or Wi-Fi coverage
Antenna isn't quite as good as the Garmin Messenger

Read Review: Garmin inReach Mini 2 Review: Up to 30-Day Battery, No-Touch Tracking

Don’t let the mini moniker fool you: the Garmin inReach Mini 2 ($400) still packs quite the punch when it comes to satellite messengers. That’s exactly why it earned the title of best feature-rich messenger in my testing — an ideal choice for someone looking for a mixture of compact design without sacrificing any features.

Let’s be upfront: The inReach Mini 2 isn’t that far off from the inReach Messenger. It just comes in a slightly different package that makes on-device functionality a bit simpler. They both use the same apps and have many of the same features, so you’re likely choosing to spend more on the Mini because of the ease of on-device use and novel navigation capabilities.

The Mini 2 offers the ability to send text messages — or even post to social media — directly from the device or app, along with checking weather (even for locations you aren’t currently at, a bonus function that helps set it apart), sharing locations, accessing Garmin’s TracBack routing feature, or using the device as a digital compass.

Setting the inReach Mini 2 apart from the Messenger is a set of rudimentary on-device navigation abilities, including straight-line navigation to waypoints, reverse breadcrumb tracking, and following courses that have been added to the device either online or through the app. These features won’t compete with most phone navigation applications today (or dedicated GPS devices), but they certainly are functional should the need arise.

You may have trouble finding something you don’t enjoy with the inReach Mini 2 (other than the purchase price), and for someone looking for all the bells and whistles, both on the device and in the app, in a streamlined design, this is the option of choice.

8.8

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 180 hrs. in standard mode; 840 hrs. in expedition mode
Battery Type: Internal Li-ion rechargeable battery
Weight: 8.1 oz.
Memory: 16 GB with expandable memory
Screen Size: 3" diag.
Rating: IPX7, MIL-STD-810
Connectivity: USB-C, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ANT+
Sensors: GPS, Galileo, QZSS, Beidou, IRNSS / Barometer altimeter + compass
Subscription Plan: $14.99 per month for annual 'Consumer: Essential' plan

Pros

Incredible updated battery life over previous model
Large, bright, easy-to-see display
On-board messaging capabilities
Waterproof rating of IPX7
Expanded global navigation system and multiband technology

Cons

Larger overall size
Pricey if you don't need the GPS abilities

Best thought of as a GPS first, communicator second, the Garmin GPSMAP 67i ($600) is the rightful heir to the place long held by the now-discontinued inReach Explorer+ and offers an impressive amount of mapping ability in conjunction with its messaging chops.

As a stand-alone GPS, the 67i has just about everything you’d be looking for — but once you add in the inReach communication abilities, it becomes a true powerhouse for those who want an all-in-one device. Easily accessed, the messaging can be accomplished on or off the device and makes use of predictive text to breeze through messages.

In addition to the full suite of inReach messaging abilities, the 67i also supports both basic and premium weather forecasts for both land and marine locations. These forecasts can be incredibly helpful when you’re deep into an expedition and need to shed a little light on what’s in store for the next week.

While my previously recommended Best Overall GPS choice, the GPSMAP 66i, was not compatible with Garmin’s new Messenger app, I was happy to see that the updated 67i gains the functionality. This is a fantastic boon for typing out extended messages on the app and means that the 67i can take advantage of the ability to send messages through cell or Wi-Fi service before pivoting to satellite use.

At a larger overall footprint and weight, I advise utilizing the GPS capabilities of the GPSMAP 67i to make it worth carrying along. I still think that the smaller inReach Messenger is the better device for most folks (as many use phones for navigation these days), but as a one-stop shop for your navigation, messaging, SOS, and weather, this device can handle it all.

9.3

Rating Details

Specifications

Network: Iridium
Satellite coverage: Global
Antenna: Flip-up, omnidirectional
Text messaging: Yes, through Iridium GO! app
Battery life: 5.5-hour talk, 15.5-hour standby
Display: Monochrome
Waterproofing: IP65 and MIL-STD 810F
Size: 4.5" x 3.2" x 1.2"
Weight: 10.7 oz.

Pros

Voice calling and SMS texting with high character limit
Email capabilities
GPS tracking
Programmable one-touch SOS button
Stowable antenna for more compact design

Cons

Inconsistent connection can make it difficult to convey adequate amounts of information effectively
Heavy and large compared to other satellite communication devices
Necessitates smartphone for functionality
Relatively limited battery life

If you’re going so remote that you need to make the occasional voice call or need internet to view a more detailed weather forecast, the Iridium GO! ($855) is the best handheld satellite option out there. It’s a whole lot of tech for most people (and has the price tag to reflect it), but it’s the best all-in-one option I’ve used yet.

Somewhere between a satellite phone and a messenger, the GO! is the device some on our testing team have taken to Denali year after year of guiding. It’s been essential for accessing upcoming weather trends and making audio updates for the folks back home. Full functionality will require you to use your phone, but we’re in full expedition mode whenever we bust out the GO! so it’s no added weight.

Audio quality is about on par with most satellite phones these days (the tech hasn’t evolved much), but it is still adequate and makes getting through a lot of information quickly possible. Mountain guide Eli Spitulnik recorded weekly transmissions on the Iridium and would ballpark audio legibility at around 90%.

This device is the only one in this lineup that will do end-to-end audio calls, and while it may seem like a luxury, there are absolutely times when you need to get a lot of information across in a short amount of time.

Combined with a phone app, this device leverages the same Iridium network that the inReach and ZOLEO devices use, but you get a much larger messaging ability with the GO — 1,000 characters versus the 160 on the (non-Plus) Garmins or ZOLEO. Texting feels much more conversational, and getting across detailed messages is easy.

You also get the same GPS tracking and SOS capabilities as those devices, meaning weight, bulk, and price are really the only things holding the Iridium back. $855 is a steep price to ask, along with the cheapest monthly subscription plan running you $65 a month (and you’ll pay $0.25 per text on top of that, though only when sending, not receiving), but if you need a device that will do it all, the investment in the GO! can make good sense.

9.2

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 25 days
Message Composition: On-device options/in-app
Weight: 4.1 oz.
Water Resistance: IPX7
Satellite System: Iridium
Subscription Plan: $14.99 per month for annual 'Consumer: Essential' plan

Pros

Full-spectrum connectivity through text, pictures, and voice
Extremely long battery life
Reliable satellite network with worldwide coverage
IPX7 waterproof device

Cons

Pricier than predecessor
Added abilities may detract from wilderness experience

If you’ve got to have the latest and greatest, the new Garmin inReach Messenger Plus ($500) is the answer. This device is the same as the standard Messenger in all but three ways, but they’re a pretty big deal and can make the extra $200 spend make sense for some.

Those three features are voice messages, images, and messaging length, which put the Plus at the head of the table for almost all satellite messengers (save for the messenger/phone Iridium GO!). I’ll note the important distinction here: satellite phones like the Iridium allow for end-to-end voice calling in real time, while the new Plus offers up voice messages, in the same style that many cellphones these days offer.

But even that added feature is a treat to use, as Hunt & Fish Editor Rachelle Schrute found while testing the Plus while hunting for elk recently. New allotments for photo and voice messages are now rolled into every Garmin subscription, and both of these abilities add a new dimension to texting your people from the backcountry. Images are modern cellphone quality, and the 30-second audio length is enough to relay a sweet nothing or two.

Take note: While text messages can be sent to any old cell number, your recipient will need the Garmin Messenger app to view the images and listen to the voice messages you send them. This is a bit annoying, and certainly so for folks who don’t otherwise own a Garmin device, but it’s simple enough to download and use.

Like the Iridium GO!, the Messenger Plus also offers expanded text limits, and the 1,600-character messages you can send are even longer than the Iridium will allow. This is currently the longest message you can send on any satellite messenger out right now, so if you tend to wax poetic, you’ve got the space.

$500 is steep for the Messenger Plus, and the extra $200 you’ll spend over the regular Messenger makes this a definite splurge purchase. But we can’t deny it’s exciting to be able to show our friends the high alpine lake we’re sleeping at tonight.

7.9

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: Phone dependent
Message Composition: On-device options/in-app
Weight: Phone dependent
Water Resistance: Phone dependent
Satellite System: SpaceX Starlink Direct to Cell system
Subscription Plan: $10 per month to add service to existing line

Pros

No extra satellite device needed
Supports RCS messaging protocol
Connects with 650+ Starlink satellites for service
Pretty quick message sending and receiving

Cons

No backup if your phone goes down for any reason
Using satellite service uses more battery
Service zones are still limited

Hot on the tail of Apple’s satellite connectivity, the T-Mobile T-Satellite Starlink Service ($10 per month plan) offers its own cell phone-based satellite messaging that goes beyond emergency contact. The T-Satellite service is still only offered in a beta version, but from what I’ve seen, it’s going to change off-grid communications.

I recently tested the service on a Samsung Galaxy S21, and it’s important to note that you’ll need a newer device that’s capable of receiving the service to use it. Enrolling in the beta service was easy, and once I left cell service, the phone automatically pivoted to the T-Satellite service without needing to toggle anything.

Sending a message is seamless from texting on cell service (though you are currently limited to only texts, no images or voice messages). Recently, from the side of remote Goat Lake in Washington’s North Cascades, I only had to wait a minute or so for the Starlink satellite to ferry my message away.

Reception would come and go in about 3-4 minute intervals, with the service toggling itself on and off. These satellites are specifically different than existing Starlink birds, and the infrastructure is still being solidified. That said, I rarely had to wait for a message to get out.

To my surprise, the T-Satellite service supports RCS (Rich Communication Services) texting, which is a messaging protocol that allows for read receipts and typing indicators. Messaging on all other satellite messengers is a wait-and-see game of not knowing if your message has been seen, so it’s a step forward.

I was even able to get messages to send and receive under tree cover, putting the T-Satellite service on par with Iridium coverage. The service is still limited (for example, I wasn’t able to use it in Alaska this summer), and I wouldn’t give up my inReach for it exclusively, but this technology does promise to move the needle significantly.

Other Satellite Messengers We Trust

The seven messengers I’ve highlighted above are just about the best we’ve used in the backcountry so far. That said, I’ve also used a handful of other devices that have gotten the message out when it counts, as well. Check out our alternate picks below.

6.9

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: Varies with phone use
Message Composition: On-device composition
Weight: N/A
Water Resistance: N/A
Satellite System: Globalstar
Subscription Plan: Free for first 2 years, pricing still unreleased

Pros

Integrated into the phone you already use
Simple to use and intuitive interface
Ability to send location pings
Assists in aiming phone at best satellite signal

Cons

Globalstar satellite coverage isn't global, and fewer areas are approved for use by Apple
As an all-in-one device, if you lose it or the battery dies, you're out of luck

Read Review: Apple Satellite Messaging Goes Live: Here’s How the iPhone 14’s Off-Grid Service Works

Welcome, friends: The future is now. The Apple iPhone Satellite Messaging functionality on iPhones is certainly the first step, at least, and adds satellite messaging directly to your mobile — no extra device required. Adding the ability doesn’t seem to have been difficult for Apple, and while there are questions about eventual subscription rates, initial testing has been great.

Tapping into the Globalstar satellite network that SPOT devices utilize, iPhone users can now text others and access emergency services when they are outside of normal cellular service. In typical Apple fashion, this is a seamless integration with the iPhone, and with the added processing power of a cellphone, Apple has also integrated an ‘aiming’ functionality into the satellite service, directing you to the best signal for sending messages.

Now that this service has expanded beyond its initial SOS-only service, I’ve had ample time to test it in the field, and the results are good. Messages are delivered at similar times to commercial messengers, and the addition of satellite connectivity also means that users can use the Find My app to share their GPS location with others — a sort of “check-in” message that won’t carry any text, but can alert others to your progress along a route.

Those considering the service should know that while Apple has made it free for an additional year (on top of the first free year since they rolled out the tech) there almost certainly will be a price tag for using the service eventually. While I can’t imagine this being more than $20-30 per month, its value will come down to whether or not additional satellite messaging services are added or not.

So why don’t we recommend everyone just buy iPhones? For one, the choice of Globalstar as a satellite network is a little disappointing (I imagine Iridium wasn’t interested in being integrated), as its coverage isn’t totally global. The new T-Satellite service from T-Mobile offers significantly improved coverage, leveraging over 650 satellites to achieve this.

Second, one of the big ideas behind a dedicated satellite messenger is that it only does one thing, and if you lose or run out of battery on your phone, there’s no other option.

Still, the prospect of (mostly) worldwide connection is exciting, and if you’re up for a cellphone upgrade anyway, Apple iPhones’ satellite messaging ability could be a big reason to make the switch.

6.4

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 7 days to 156 days (dependent on tracking)
Message Composition: Pre-set messages only
Weight: 5 oz.
Water Resistance: IPX8
Satellite System: Globalstar
Subscription Plan: $11.95 /month for annual 'Basic' plan

Pros

Simple to operate
Minimal size and weight
Inexpensive price and subscription plans
Powered by easy-to-obtain AAA batteries

Cons

Lack of functionality
No two-way messaging, only preset messages
Not rechargeable

Read Review: SPOT Gen4 Review: Better Maps, More Messages, and Auto-Send

In the modern world of satellite messengers, the SPOT Gen4 ($150) doesn’t quite sit at the head of the table — but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t fill an important spot in the market for folks searching for something akin to a backup messaging option.

The Gen4 has no custom on-device or in-app messaging, and there’s very little in the way of features beyond the SOS signaling, pre-set message sending and GPS location sends. But for the pre-planner, or just as a purely emergency device, the Gen4 fulfills its duty well.

When it comes to messaging, you’ve got three options with this device: Pre-programmed, an SOS call, and the clever option for a “spot assist” if you don’t need emergency services, but you do need to let loved ones know things aren’t going well. In my mind, this makes the Gen4 ideal for riding in the glovebox for emergencies.

I will note that all message recipients must be established pre-trip, as there’s no way to reconfigure the device when away from a computer, and there’s no way for the SPOT Gen4 to receive messages.

In testing out the messaging system of the SPOT Gen4, it appeared to struggle the most to find a signal (not wildly uncommon in satellite communications). The Gen4 does offer green LED lights to let you know you have a satellite connection and red lights to let you know you’re not connected, an added benefit from a budget option.

The SPOT Gen4 is a slimmed-down, bare-bones version of a satellite messenger, and for most folks, I recommend getting the ZOLEO Satellite Communicator, which allows you to custom-type messages through its own app. The Iridium network it uses is also more robust. But if you just need the SOS button, the Gen4 is cheap to get and cheaper to maintain a plan for.

6.4

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 120 hours
Message Composition: In-app composition
Weight: 3.3 oz.
Water Resistance: IPX7
Satellite System: Iridium
Subscription Plan: $14.99 /month for annual 'Basic' plan

Pros

Lightweight and easily stowable
Ample app functionality
USB-C charging
GroupTrack ability allows for group messaging

Cons

Limited battery life
No on-device messaging ability
Our device stopped charging after 1 year of use

The ACR Bivy Stick ($300) takes a slightly different approach and relies heavily on its well-performing app for the bulk of its functionality. This makes the Bivy Stick ideal for the adventurer wanting basic on-device functionality while willing to rely on the smartphone app for all the fun extras.

The Bivy’s on-device functionality is basic, with an SOS button tucked under a rubberized flap — ACR uses Global Rescue for its emergency services — a USB-C charging port, and a pre-set “okay” button.

The functionality really steps up with the Bluetooth-connected app. In the app, you can compose and receive messages, both email and text, while adding your location to your communication. I will note that, like ZOLEO, the Bivy Stick will send and receive on the Iridium network, as well as cellular or Wi-Fi coverage.

Quick-touch options in the app also perform message alerts, SOS calls, and more. The app offers a map view so you can track your current location and progress (or see routes) and other options let you see your data usage, track adventures, check the weather, and — for an additional subscription price — create group messages.

Two LED lights give you info on the signal strength and status of a message, which is a nice function that some others don’t have. The signal lights go from green to yellow to red to let you know strength, while the status light lets you know if you’re sending or receiving a message, if SOS is active, and if you’re successfully tracking your progress.

I admit these are nice touches when figuring out signal strength, and if a message was sent. Bivy uses the Iridium satellite network and offers a dedicated phone number and email for satellite messaging, another feature common with ZOLEO, but not yet offered by Garmin.

Unfortunately, I found that after a few seasons of use, our Bivy Stick would no longer take charge. I’m not sure exactly what the issue is, but there doesn’t seem to be any fixing it. While this certainly might be a fluke, it’s not the type of thing you want to have happen to your emergency device. For most folks, the equally priced Garmin inReach Messenger is likely a better buy — even for the small screen alone.

6.1

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 240 hours in 10-minute tracking mode
Message Composition: On-device composition
Weight: 7 oz.
Water Resistance: IP67
Satellite System: Globalstar
Subscription Plan: $11.95 /month for annual 'Basic' plan

Pros

Familiar QWERTY on-screen message composition
Ability to compose messages on or off the device
In-device navigation capable
Competitive subscription plans with plenty of custom messages included

Cons

Bulky size
Globalstar network isn't the most robust (little coverage in polar regions)
Micro-USB charging instead of modern USB-C

Read Review: First Look: SPOT X 2-Way Satellite Messenger

Think BlackBerry with a satellite connection — that’s what comes to mind when first working with the SPOT X Satellite Messenger ($250). Ideal for the adventurer who doesn’t want to be tied to a smartphone in any way, this device gets the job done all on its own.

The illuminated QWERTY keyboard is the real star of the show here and makes the SPOT X an effective on-device message composer — a real bonus for communication in the wild when you don’t want to pull out a smartphone. The device even incorporates predictive text technology to allow you to breeze through longer messages.

Along with the SOS and wayfinding, it is the two-way communication that makes the SPOT X stand out. And while it was originally only offered without it, you can now decide if you want to use the associated smartphone app for sending and receiving messages, or keep the smartphone stowed and send and receive only on the device, which we found was actually pretty easy to do.

Unfortunately, the SPOT Globalstar network is one of the slower satellite options we investigated, and there’s certainly a need to find a clear path to the sky for the SPOT X. When you get that, though, it can speed up your communication. Global coverage is also not quite global, with high polar latitudes lacking connection.

I also had a few grumbles with getting the SPOT X set up, as firmware updates require a cable and computer to accomplish. But once those hoops are navigated, the device is a fairly straightforward piece of kit to operate. The SPOT X puts on-device functionality front and center. If that’s important for you — and you’re okay with the added heft of the device — give this option a spin.

6.0

Top fitness watch brands include Garmin, COROS, Suunto, Polar, and Fitbit; (photo/Matthew Tangeman)

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 96 hours
Message Composition: In-app composition
Weight: 2.5 oz.
Water Resistance: IP68
Satellite System: Inmarsat and Echostar
Subscription Plan: $20/month for annual 'Monthly' plan

Pros

Budget price
Minuscule profile and weight
Tough exterior with drop, shock, and water resistance ratings

Cons

SOS button isn't protected
No global satellite coverage
Need to download an app to compose and respond to messages
Subscription prices have risen significantly

Recently new, the Motorola Defy Satellite Link ($150) is an exciting addition to satellite messenger offerings and takes the tack that I see many other sat messengers doing today — poising itself as a sort of satellite hotspot that’s meant to be tethered to your phone (as most of us are these days).

The tradeoff here is that if your mobile takes the dive for any reason, you lose the advanced messaging abilities and are stuck with a simple “check-in” message sent to a pre-chosen contact. But being offered right out of the gate with some of the cheapest subscription plans of any satellite messenger, the Defy makes a compelling case for those who need a simple get-it-done device.

So why hasn’t the Defy knocked the ZOLEO out of the Best Budget spot? Well, there are some kinks to work out. But first the good: At $150, the Defy is available for just about the bottom dollar when it comes to satellite messengers today — only the SPOT Gen4 and ZOLEO are the same price.

The device itself is also in a league of its own when it comes to overall size and shape, weighing in at only 2.5 ounces and easily nesting into your palm (the SPOT Gen4 is thicker, the Bivy Stick is taller, and both are heavier). The Defy is also the first to use the Inmarsat and Echostar satellite networks in a satellite messenger, having previously only hosted voice-only sat phones.

In practice, however, these systems aren’t ideal for many users, as they as geostationary and located over the equator, which means you’ll need to be aimed at them to receive signal. In practice testing in the northern hemisphere, I found that any large mountains to south would kill my reception.

The SOS button, in a rather head-scratching move, is located on the side of the device and unshielded from erroneous pressing. Every other device on the market today opts for some type of cover to prevent accidental calvary-calling, and its omission here was a bit worrisome in my testing. Hopefully, this will gain a cover in later iterations.

While Defy positioned itself as the cheapest subscription option when entering the U.S. market, it has raised its prices and isn’t as good a value anymore. If you’re using the ‘Monthly’ plan, you’ll actually be in an annual contract with a cancellation fee equal to what you owe for the rest of the contract, so I only recommend going with the Annual plan.

Satellite Messenger Comparison Chart

Satellite Messenger	Price	Battery Life	Message Composition	Weight	Satellite System	Subscription Plan*
Garmin inReach Messenger	$300	28 days	On-device options/in-app	4 oz.	Iridium	$15 /month
ZOLEO Satellite Messenger	$200	200 hours	In-app composition	5.3 oz.	Iridium	$20 /month
Garmin inReach Mini 2	$400	14 days	On-device options/in-app	3.5 oz.	Iridium	$15 /month
Garmin GPSMAP 67i	$600	425 hours	On-device options/in-app	8.1 oz.	Iridium	$15 /month
Iridium GO!	$855	15.5 hours	In-app composition	10.7 oz.	Iridium	$65 /month
Garmin inReach Messenger Plus	$500	25 days	On-device options/in-app	4.1 oz.	Iridium	$15 /month
T-Mobile T-Satellite Service	N/A	N/A	On-device composition	N/A	Starlink	$10 /month
Apple iPhone Satellite Messaging	N/A	N/A	On-device composition	N/A	Globalstar	Unreleased pricing
SPOT Gen4	$150	7 to 156 days	Pre-set messages only	5 oz.	Globalstar	$12 /month
ACR Bivy Stick	$300	120 hours	In-app composition	3.3 oz.	Iridium	$15 /month
SPOT X	$250	240 hours	On-device composition	7 oz.	Globalstar	$12 /month
Motorola Defy Satellite Link	$150	96 hours	In-app composition	2.5 oz.	Inmarsat and Echostar	$20 /month

*Subscription plan amount given for the lowest overhead annual ‘Basic’, ‘Essential’, or ‘Safety’ plans

There are many devices on the market today, and we sought out the spread to compact them head-to-head; (photo/Tim Newcomb)

How We Tested the Best Satellite Messengers

We’d be lying if we said we’ve never gotten ourselves lost. Thankfully, the crew at GearJunkie is a savvy bunch, and our trials and tribulations have led us to be big proponents of carrying along a satellite messaging device when headed out into the backcountry.

Field testing: Our field testing is the most important aspect of evaluating these satellite messengers, and it’s the primary consideration we draw insight from when rating and recommending them. We don’t just hike either — we’ve carried these devices across mountain ranges, while whitewater packrafting, and generally hanging it out there on the line in the backcountry.
Message send and receive challenge: I tested devices side by side, timing send and receive times, as well as the connection speed to satellites. I also sought out difficult terrain to challenge reception by attempting to send messages from deep canyons and beneath dense tree cover. When feasible, I also test these devices’ SOS emergency messaging capabilities by scheduling device tests with the service providers.
Battery, size, and weight measurements: Charge and discharge rates are also measured in-house, and I even toss these devices on our own scales to ensure the manufacturer’s claims about weight and size are accurate.
Our satellite messenger rating system:
- Messaging Ability: 30% weighted. Is the satellite system used robust? Does the device connect to service quickly to send messages? Does it receive them reliably? Is there an associated app to draft messages on?
- Feature Set: 30% weighted. Does the messenger sport any added functions beyond messaging? Is the SOS button protected? Does it display weather forecasts or other information?
- Battery Life: 20% weighted. To score well here, I look for a decent battery life in both static and active messaging modes. Does the battery recharge quickly? Can the device be used to charge other electronics?
- Durability: 20% weighted. Does the device hold up to backcountry use? Do any screens scratch easily? Are all buttons still easy to press?

Nothing challenges battery life like below-freezing testing, and we put each of these messengers through the same regimen; (photo/Matthew Tangeman)

Our Testing Experts and Testing Locations

I, Senior Editor Nick Belcaster, contributed heavily to this guide, leveraging my experience as a wilderness guide in the North Cascades of Washington State and extensive time spent clacking out “I’m OK” messages from the backcountry. I have utilized satellite messengers to get updates on closing-in wildfires, arrange for supply drops, and assist in extracting injured clients.

Assisting myself is a team of AMGA mountain guides, ice climbers, trail runners, and many other GearJunkie athletes who use sat messengers daily to keep in contact from afar. Tim Newcomb is a veteran gear tester who also calls the Pacific Northwest home, and assisted heavily in getting out with these devices in order to test real-world messaging capabilities.

All devices detailed in our selection were tested over multiple months by multiple gear experts and in varying conditions throughout the Pacific Northwest and Southwest. Whether hiking, biking, climbing, ski-touring, or simply putting the devices through their paces, the satellite messengers underwent a mixture of experiences to test them in real-life use cases.

From the mountains of the Pacific Northwest to the deserts of the American Southwest, we sought out the remote to test these sat messengers; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose a Satellite Messenger

Every satellite messenger has a mixture of different functions and designs. Users may find that some fit their expected adventures better than others, so it isn’t always a one-size-fits-all approach to selecting the best satellite messenger.

Before you dive into a satellite messenger, carefully review its features and functionality to determine what you think you’ll need for how you expect to use the device. You also should keep in mind that the cost of ownership of a satellite messenger is more than the initial purchase price.

While you can get a device for as little as $150 and spend up to $400, each one requires a subscription service to allow it to connect to satellites for communication, even emergency communication.

Once you’ve narrowed down your top satellite messenger selections, I suggest looking over the company’s subscription plans to see what’s included in the differing options. Features you may find essential may come at a steeper per-month price than you want to pay.

With a wide variety of devices available, keying in on exactly what you want to do with a satellite messenger will help you decide which one is right for you; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Emergency Support and Messaging

Know that a satellite messenger’s main goal is to provide emergency support when needed — every messenger comes with an on-device SOS button, but they also can help keep you connected to friends and family in non-emergency situations when cellular coverage is not possible.

You likely won’t use your satellite messenger as you would a smartphone — and if you don’t expect to, you can select something such as the ZOLEO or SPOT Gen4 — but understanding the capabilities of your device can help with expectations. For example, messages sent via satellite may well take up to 20 minutes to send, even in ideal situations with the best on-device communicators, the Garmin inReach Mini 2 and SPOT X.

Deciding which device to go with will depend upon your needs, as well as how often you plan to use it. Below, I dive into the three main types of satellite messengers: SOS beacons, app-assisted communicators, and all-in-one devices.

Differing Styles

The SPOT Gen4 is just about the most basic style of satellite messenger, while the SPOT X offers on-device and app-assisted messaging; (photo/Tim Newcomb)

There are three main styles of satellite messenger, although overlap does exist. The most basic offers a simple SOS function and pre-set messages, all sent from the device without tethering to a phone, such as the SPOT Gen4. These devices are best thought of as a ‘set it and forget it’ option, and you’ll be limited to sending messages that you’ve pre-written at home.

It’s important to note that communication is one-way, which makes these devices most similar to personal locator beacons (PLBs) — which combine a satellite SOS function with a 406 MHz tone for rescuers to hone in on.

The next type offers these same functions but then includes an app — think ZOLEO, Motorola Defy, and Bivy Stick — that connects via Bluetooth to a smartphone for additional two-way messaging and functionality. This is a great step up in terms of functionality, in our opinion, and being able to craft custom messages has often gotten us out of a jam when outdoors, like changing itineraries or rendezvous points.

The third style includes the aforementioned features, but then also offers on-device functionality, from message composition to weather forecasting, as seen in the Garmin inReach Messenger, Garmin inReach Mini 2, and SPOT X.

These messengers are best for folks who want it all, or want the ability to leave their phone at home. Because they operate independently of a separate device, these messengers also have the most built-in safety of the bunch.

What About Satellite-Enabled Cell Phones?

The new T-Mobile T-Satellite service is hosted by Starlink and works surprisingly well; (photo/Erika Courtney)

Apple iPhone

For a few years now, Apple has offered a satellite-assisted SOS functionality on iPhones, and recently unlocked the functionality further to allow for messaging abilities. These messages are limited in similar ways to the types of messages you can send on most satellite messengers (no images or video), and other than taking a little longer to send, the functionality is similar to texting on the device. I expect voice connectivity will come sometime later this year.

Apple uses Globalstar satellites to support its service, and we expect the same far-latitude limitations that the satellite installation has currently. That still covers a large swath of the populated world, however. The service is free for now, but it isn’t clear if it will always be that way (Apple previously offered its SOS functionality for free for two years, then extended it another year).

Starlink and T-Mobile

In early 2025, T-Mobile unlocked a beta version of its T-Satellite service, a Starlink-powered satellite connection that would integrate messages in much the same way the iPhone is offered — an endeavor that’s been a few years in the making. Initially, text messaging was the only option, but a suite of satellite-optimized apps has now been approved for use, including AllTrails, WhatsApp, and Google Maps.

Starlink has already made a compact version of its satellite receiver for mobile use, and the service is well-proven at this point. We’re interested to see how quickly other service providers jump onto the satellite bandwagon. It may only be a few years until most people have satellite connectivity in their pockets.

Satellite Messenger Networks

The ZOLEO Satellite Communicator uses colored LEDs to relay its current satellite connection status; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

First, it’s important to make a distinction between the two types of satellite systems that a satellite messenger will depend on. Global Navigation Satellite Systems, or GNSS, are satellite networks that provide location and speed information to devices like handheld GPS units. The most well-known of these is the GPS system, which is managed by the U.S. government, though other international systems exist.

Satellite messaging systems, like Iridium and Globalstar, provide communications information between the transmitter and receiver, and both services feature low earth orbit satellites covering much of the Earth. In fact, the polar orbit of Iridium satellites allows it to cover even the poles, while Globalstar has points on Earth it doesn’t reach. Because of this, Iridium devices will be the best choice for those traveling to polar regions.

Other satellite networks, such as Inmarsat, orbit the planet in a geostationary pattern, with 15 satellites that are located along the equator. Because these satellites track the orbit of the Earth, they remain in the same place. This means that coverage is best between the 60-degree latitudes and that you may occasionally lose connection in deep valleys where your line of sight is obscured.

Knowing when you’ve got a good connection with the satellites goes a long way in getting messages out in a timely manner; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Iridium has more satellites (66) than Globalstar, but Globalstar sends them higher to provide additional coverage. Another key difference is Globalstar relays with Earth-based transmission stations, which can cause a greater delay in messaging than the satellite-to-satellite relays from Iridium. No matter which device you choose, check the coverage areas of its satellite provider to ensure it covers your planned adventures.

When you send a message, your device will queue it up for the next time that it is in contact with the satellite network. While these systems offer broad coverage, it may take a few minutes for a satellite to pass overhead and into view of the satellite messenger. Finding a clearing or promontory can greatly improve your reception.

Emergency Coordination

You can arrange for a test SOS activation with Garmin to ensure your device is working properly; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

For obvious reasons, I didn’t live-fire test the response time of emergency responders. But every satellite messenger comes with an SOS button that summons emergency help. Each company contracts with a service provider to coordinate a response, and while we don’t have data from every one, we do know that those buttons do get pushed a good bit: Garmin recently fielded its 10,000th inReach SOS call.

Many satellite messengers also allow you to test their SOS service to ensure that it is operating as normal. On Garmin devices, you’ll need to schedule an SOS Assistance Test, which provides a time slot for you to test the service. On SPOT devices, you’ll need to enable the SOS Test Mode in your online account before attempting.

Once your message goes out, it’s relayed to an emergency coordination center. Garmin recently purchased GEOS, now owning one of the leading emergency operations. ZOLEO contracts with GEOS. ACR’s Bivy uses Global Rescue and SPOT contracts with FocusPoint International. All of these services are on the other end when you trigger an emergency call.

What Happens When You Trigger an SOS?

No need to call the calvary — having the ability to send custom messages greatly simplifies letting others know your status; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

When you make the call to trigger an SOS, you’ll need to uncover and depress the SOS button to summon help. This will send a message to the emergency service provider that you have contracted with through your subscription. It’s important to know that without a current subscription, SOS service does not work.

On Garmin devices, these SOS messages are given a higher priority in the Iridium satellite system to ensure that they get to where they need to go. No matter the service, the functionality is similar, with the company working with local search and rescue teams to coordinate a response to your SOS call.

Some devices, like the Garmin inReach Messenger, SPOT X, and ZOLEO Satellite Messenger, allow you to send custom SOS messages to the emergency response service. This can be incredibly helpful when coordinating a rescue, and often an emergency coordinator will put you in contact with the local Search and Rescue (SAR) to better assist you. Response times can vary from a few hours to a few days, depending entirely on terrain, weather, and resources.

It’s important to note that some simpler devices, like the SPOT Gen4, will only display an LED light to confirm that an SOS message has been sent, and not necessarily received. This has caused some to panic during an emergency and opt to send multiple SOS messages — ultimately delaying their rescue.

Messaging, Weather Updates, and Tracking

With a phone, the ACR Bivy Stick can type and send custom messages, but without one, you’ll be stuck with your preset messages; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Thankfully, the majority of us will never need to hit that SOS button, instead relying on our satellite messengers to communicate with others, seek out weather updates, and track ourselves on excursions. Most devices offer two-way messaging, with the exception of the SPOT Gen4, meaning you’ll be able to both create and receive messages from abroad.

A 160-character limit is typical of most SMS and email messages sent from satellite messengers, with slight variation from provider to provider. These messages can also be appended with your GPS location, giving those on the outside some peace of mind knowing where you are.

Types of Messages

Messages fall into one of two categories: Preset, Predefined, or Check-In messages, and Custom messages. Messages in the Preset category are those that are arranged before setting out on our trip, and typically relay messages such as “I’m Okay,” “I’m Starting My Trip Here,” or “I Made It to Camp.” These messages are very often unlimited and don’t count against your subscription allotments.

Custom messages are those that are created on the fly, and can either be produced on-device or through an accompanying app. These messages are not limited to who they can be sent to, but they will count against your subscription if you have a messaging limit. Don’t fear if you go over, however, all providers will spot you extra messages, at a typical 25-50-cent rate per message.

Being able to track and share your location to a phone number, email, or even another inReach device makes backcountry rendezvous a breeze; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Weather Forecasts

Certain satellite messengers, like the Garmin and ZOLEO devices, also utilize their satellite connections to deliver weather forecasts directly to your messenger. These forecasts will display the high/low temperature, conditions, wind speed and direction, and precipitation chance of either the location you are currently in or a location of your choosing.

Garmin devices also offer an extended forecasting option (at $1 per), which bumps out the forecast window from 4 to 8 days, and offers a finer interval of forecast reporting. There is also the option to request a marine forecast, which includes information on wave height, currents, and visibility.

Tracking

Tracking your progress can be a handy tool for both yourself, as well as those following along at home. This tracking is most often broken down into different intervals, allowing you to adjust the frequency at which a location is recorded. SPOT devices provide tracking at all levels of subscription, whereas Garmin offers it unlimited at the mid-tier subscription rate, and ZOLEO offers it as a ‘Location Share+’ add-on for $6 /month extra.

When it comes to the pay-to-track crowd, we will note that the Bivy Stick is a particularly poor deal when it comes to tracking: A monthly basic plan allows 20 credits, which are shared between messages and tracking, and can quickly be chewed up at one credit per 30 minutes at the 5-minute tracking interval. You can pare down your tracking interval to once every hour, but functionally, I find this to be too coarse for accurate tracking.

Applications

The Garmin Messenger app was a leap forward in messaging ability, as it added cellular and Wi-Fi as alternative avenues for sending messages; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

I can’t go too far without needing an app for that these days, and it’s the same in the world of satellite messengers. A few of the key devices tested, such as the ZOLEO and Bivy, require you to connect via Bluetooth to your smartphone to use the app for custom messaging, and most of the functionality (really, anything other than the SOS or “OK” message).

Garmin, while allowing for on-device messaging on both the inReach Messenger and inReach Mini 2, has a strong app that makes messaging much simpler than on the device. We’ll note that even some Garmin smartwatches integrate with the devices for easy wrist-triggered SOS messages.

The SPOT X doesn’t rely as much on an app, but it is there for additional functions. And it works just swell. The SPOT Gen4 is the only device we tested that doesn’t tie into an app for its in-field functionality.

The Functionality You Need

The ZOLEO Satellite Communicator lands at about the middle of the spectrum when it comes to functionality, and serves most adventurers most of the time; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

What you need out of a satellite messenger depends on the adventures you’ll go on. Are you a one-day or weekend trip adventurer who is generally in cellular coverage, but wants access to the SOS function for those emergency situations when cellular coverage might not be available? If so, going basic may be enough.

Are you planning multiday trips out of cellular coverage and want to not only have emergency functions, but also messaging capabilities? That will require a device that can handle your plans. Understand what type of adventurer you are and select a messenger — and service plan — to fit those needs.

Satellite Messenger Subscription Plans

The Garmin inReach Messenger sports an impressive 28-day battery life when sending a message every 10 minutes, and can reverse charge other electronics; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Editor’s Note: Subscription plan information is accurate as of November 2025.

Beyond your one-time purchase price, you’ll also need to select a subscription service to render the device useful. Typically offered as monthly plans, you can select how many messages you can use, how much tracking you can do, and so forth. Carefully look through service plan options before you buy so you don’t get stuck with a device you don’t want to pay to stay active.

Garmin inReach Plans

The Garmin plans offer great flexibility in pricing (as low as $15 and as high as $55 per month), which also impacts what you get. Recently updated in late 2024, the plans are broken up into two tiers: Consumer and Professional, and now move away from Freedom and Annual plans, and instead, there are three levels of service: Essential, Standard, and Premium.

The most basic Essential consumer plans allow for 50 text messages, tracking intervals of every 10 minutes, and an activation fee of $40 with overage charges for additional text messages, weather services, and location requests. The $50 Premium monthly plan offers tracking every 2 minutes and unlimited tracking points, text messages, location requests, and more.

All plans as of 2025 now support some number of photo and voice messages (between 10 and 50 a month), but you’ll need the inReach Messenger Plus to use the service.

ZOLEO Plans

ZOLEO ranges from $20 to $35 to $50 per month and steps from 25 messages to 250 to unlimited along the plan choices. You can add $6 per month for location shares and get unlimited check-in messages. Overages for each message is $0.50 for the first two plans. ZOLEO has recently raised its activation fee to $40.

SPOT Plans

The SPOT X plans range from $12 to $40 per month with six different plans. Expect to get anywhere from 20 custom messages to hundreds or even unlimited messages. The SPOT Gen4 features two plans, either $12 or $15 per month, depending on if you sign up for a year or go month-to-month. The nearly identical plans both come with unlimited check-in or help messages and basic tracking.

SPOT has a $30 activation fee for any subscription, and if you’re using their Flex plans (where you pay by the month and can elect to leave the device unactivated when you aren’t using it), you’ll also pay an annual ‘Flex Charge’ fee of $35. We’ve tallied the math, and if you’re going to use your SPOT device for more than 6 months of the year, you should purchase an annual contract plan.

ACR Plans

The Bivy Stick has four plans — all available at a discount for a yearly contract or more expensive for a month-to-month contract — ranging from $15 per month to $65. The basic plan includes 20 credits, which can be used as a message or tracking, with overages of $0.75 per credit.

Each step up includes additional credits and services until unlimited credits with group tracking. Bivy has no activation fee, instead differentiating the monthly price based on contract length.

Motorola Plans

Motorola Defy contracts with Bullitt Satellite for their subscription coverage, and while they used to be highly competitive as the cheapest satellite messenger service out there, they have raised their plan prices significantly in 2025.

You can pay either monthly or annually, but the monthly plan requires a 12-month contract, and you’ll be charged an early cancellation fee of the amount you still owe on your year. The $190 annual plan is the better of the two, and you’ll pay a $10 activation fee.

Size, Weight, and Batteries

While most satellite messengers sport a long battery life, be mindful of having a backup power source to keep them juiced up when it counts; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

While most satellite messengers are compact, some do come lighter and smaller than others (here’s looking at you, inReach Mini 2 and Bivy Stick). And that may be great in certain situations. If you’re lugging tons of equipment with you, a few ounces or an inch or two in size may not matter, and you can embrace the SPOT X, but if you want something you can carry in your hand while you run or clip to a small pack while you bike, for example, these specifications will hold extra importance.

Another specification to watch is battery life, especially if you plan on long adventures or already have a set routine for charging devices (will micro-USB or USB-C require you to bring an extra cord?) while on an adventure. Most satellite messengers aim to provide extended battery life for long trips into the backcountry, but it’s important to remember that this battery life can be limited by the number of messages sent, tracking intervals, and active screen time.

Almost all sat messengers today, with the exception of the SPOT Gen4, sport an integrated rechargeable battery that can be juiced up in the field from a solar panel or power bank. Some, like the Garmin inReach Messenger, even offer reverse USB-C charging that can perk up your other electronics if needed.

Durability

The IPX7 rating of the Garmin inReach Messenger means that it’s protected from ingress of dirt, water, or blowing snow; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

New brands need to start somewhere, but decide if you’re willing to start with them. The likes of Garmin and SPOT have led the satellite messenger categories for years, and have built in dependability in terms of quality of product. But that doesn’t mean that ACR or ZOLEO aren’t there yet.

All the messengers we tested, except for SPOT-branded devices, use the trusted Iridium satellite system for reliable coverage, so we don’t expect issues there.

Then there’s the durability of the device itself. Each device has undergone testing to earn an international IP number. Both the Garmin devices nor the Bivy Stick weren’t tested against dust and earned a 7 for water (an IPX7 rating represents this), which allows for water immersion protection up to three feet for 30 minutes.

The SPOT X earned an IP67, which offers complete dust protection with the same level of water protection.

The SPOT Gen4 and ZOLEO devices are rated at IP68, complete dust protection with water immersion protection for long periods of time under pressure, the most durable of the devices tested.

Understand how you plan to use your satellite messenger and then choose a device that fits your personal needs.

Price & Value

There is a wide range of devices out there, so consider what you’ll be using them for the most before purchasing; (photo/Tim Newcomb)

There’s a pretty broad range of satellite messenger prices out there, with budget-friendly devices asking $150 to all-in-one units $600 units that’ll be your GPS, messenger, and even flashlight. Because everyone has different aspirations outdoors (and needs), consider how you’ll be using your satellite messenger, how frequently, and if custom messaging is important for you. It’s one thing to send a quick ‘I’m OK!’ message on a backpacking trip, and another to coordinate a high-alpine rescue in Nepal.

Budget

The budget satellite messengers prioritize the essentials, with the emergency SOS function being the number one. These units often don’t host any type of on-device message composition and instead rely on pre-selected messages that you manage from home. You’ll also more often be locked into the Globalstar satellite network, which is cheaper to access, but not quite as good as the more prevalent Iridium system.

The ZOLEO Satellite Messenger is an outsized value at $1500, as it both uses Iridium birds, as well as hosts an app where you can clack out custom messages. The downside here is a slightly chunky profile, as well as a more limited battery life of 8 days. You also can’t message directly from the device, but so long as you’ve got your phone, you’re covered.

Mid-Tier

Bumping up to $300-400 devices gets you a good bit more, and this is where you think most outdoor folks are best served. For one, mid-tier devices all use the gold-standard Iridium network, which has truly global coverage and quick send-and-receive times. You also almost always get an on-device messaging ability, even if it is a little clunky.

An important factor in your choice should also include the price of the subscription, and while it’s gone up slightly recently, the $15 a month you’ll pay for the Garmin inReach Messenger ($300) or inReach Mini 2 ($400) is still a solid deal for the lowest tiered plan. These devices will also last significantly longer than budget ones, with a runtime of between 14 and 28 days.

Premium

Spending the big bucks will get you all the bells and whistles, and the $600 Garmin GPSMAP 67i is part GPS, part messenger, and for those who need a one-and-done unit, this is it. A full-color screen and predictive texting make clacking out a message easy, and the host of other features really bump up the value.

For the same price, you could also get into a new Apple iPhone or T-Mobile Phone, which now hosts satellite messaging. The Iridium GO! ($855) is certainly specialized, but for the money, you’re getting a satellite phone, messenger, and internet hotspot in one device.

Frequently Asked Questions

A satellite messenger, which requires a subscription service to operate, connects to a satellite system to send and receive messages. This process is different than the near-instantaneous response of a cellular or WiFi network. The device uses this satellite capability to keep you connected to others when cellular coverage is not available.

If you plan to adventure beyond cellular coverage, you may want to consider having an active subscription to a satellite messenger. The only reliable way to call for emergency services or let loved ones know you’re in a safe place is by relying on satellite messenger coverage.

It is hard to argue that Garmin doesn’t make the best satellite messengers, whether the inReach Messenger or the inReach Mini 2, but that doesn’t mean Garmin is the only manufacturer of quality satellite messengers.

We can recommend Garmin products based on our independent testing, but were also impressed with a mixture of additional satellite messengers from a variety of companies.

In short, potentially. You want to ensure that you have the SOS option on your satellite messenger — a standard feature in the industry — and the ability to send an “I’m OK” message when needed.

How much additional functionality you want to have on your device is up to you. Relying on tethering to your smartphone via Bluetooth requires that your phone doesn’t lose connectivity to your device and your phone stays charged and accessible. The more on-device message composition functionality, the less you need to rely on your smartphone and the device’s app to stay connected.

Being able to write a custom message adds a great deal of flexibility to your communications; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Be patient when it comes to satellite messages. It may take just a few minutes to send a message, especially with a clear sky and no tree coverage. But getting a connection to a satellite may be tough in some locations, and even the positioning of satellites or heavy cloud cover can alter the timeline of your message.

Keep in mind, there’s no guarantee you can get a signal to a satellite, so some cases may require a high level of patience or willingness to move in order to connect to the satellite.

Technology

The Best Handheld GPS of 2025

There’s no need to rely on your smartphone or smartwatch for navigation. We rounded up the best handheld GPS devices for finding your way.

" data-medium-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2024/03/DSC_3776.jpg" data-large-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2024/03/DSC_3776.jpg" />

Fitness

The Best Fitness Watches of 2025

We tested the best fitness watches of 2025 with options for every budget. Our top picks include Garmin, COROS, and more!

Gorgeous Display, Beautiful Price: COROS Pace 4 Sport Watch Review

Andrew McLemore — Mon, 17 Nov 2025 19:59:54 +0000

COROS has been playing catch-up to competitors for years. With the latest update to its flagship Pace line, the brand may have finally matched stride with the leaders.

That’s not to say that the Pace 4 represents the pinnacle of sports smartwatches. You’d have to pay three to four times the price to get something top-of-the-line. But most of us don’t need the best of the best.

Most of us just need a durable watch with reliable health and activity tracking, some decent navigation/GPS, and maybe some training help for the more serious athletes out there. Looking sexy ain’t too shabby, either.

The new Pace 4 offers a solid blend of these qualities, and at a price that’s far lower than I expected. I put the Pace 4 through its paces on long trail days, nighttime bike rides, and casual river hikes. It’s a solid watch design coated with a gorgeous display. There’s loads to love about this one, even when it lacks some top-shelf features found on pricier models.

In short: With the Pace 4, COROS adds an AMOLED display and other new features like voice notes and a flashlight — while keeping the price tag to a reasonable $250. The watch’s balance of features and price makes it a serious competitor to more expensive “name brands” like Garmin and Suunto. Beautiful, functional, and straight-up fun to use, the Pace 4 is a mid-tier sports watch that’s an attractive choice for first-time smartwatch buyers. It might even convert loyalists away from other brands, too.

7.5

Rating Details

Specifications

Size: 43.4 x 43.4 x 11.8 mm
Weight: 32 g with nylon strap, 40 g with silicone band
Battery life: 6 days (always on), 19 days (gesture only)
Global Satellite Networks: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS reception
Screen: 1.2" AMOLED touchscreen display with mineral glass, fiber-reinforced polymer case
Navigation capable: Breadcrumb
Barometric altimeter and compass: Yes
Water resistance: 5 ATM (50m)

Pros

Improved display
Competitive price
Lightweight
Reliable health tracking
Quick navigation help

Cons

No offline maps
Less durable nylon polymer case and mineral glass
Flashlight has limited usefulness
AMOLED lowers 'always on' battery life

COROS Pace 4 Review

It’s been 2 years since COROS released the Pace 3, a reliable, affordable design that soon became GearJunkie’s pick for Best Budget Fitness Watch in our guide to the Best Fitness Watches of 2025.

In general, the Pace 4 doesn’t deviate too much from the success of that model. Instead, it offers a few more reasons to strap it on and keep it there. The AMOLED display is the big add-on here — and it certainly makes a huge difference.

I’ve been testing the Pace 4 against the Apex 4, which has a lower-clarity MIP display, and the Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED, which balances the upgraded display with analog hands.

(Photo/Andrew McLemore)

AMOLED displays just look awesome. They make it easier to quickly read and comprehend the complex data that’s now available on all these devices. Getting a better display on the Pace 4 while only raising the price $20 from the previous generation? That’s a pretty good deal, especially considering that Garmin didn’t hesitate to raise prices again this year, and by much larger margins.

In other words, COROS must have been listening to reviews like the one from my GJ colleague Nick Belcaster. He wrote in 2023 that the Pace 3 “ruined my love affair with high-end watches.” The Pace 4 adds to what Belcaster loved about the previous generation — without sacrificing any of its tried-and-true hardware.

AMOLED and Battery Life

Though I’ve been enjoying the COROS Apex 4, I have to admit that I miss the Pace 4’s AMOLED display. Of course, there’s a good reason the Apex 4 uses a MIP display — the battery lasts longer. Given that the Apex series is designed for longer activities in more remote areas, it makes sense to give it a more efficient display.

COROS Apex 4; (photo/Andrew McLemore)

The Pace series, by comparison, aims for road runners and other activities closer to home and cell service. It’s a watch that’s perfect for most athletes, and only falls short once you’re aiming to do longer, multiday activities.

Despite sporting an AMOLED display that uses more battery, the Pace 4 still improves on battery life compared to the Pace 3 in almost every category. In gesture-based mode (when the watch only turns on the display when you look at it), you get 19 days on the Pace 4 — 4 more days than the Pace 3.

However, if you use the watch with the display always turned on, the Pace 4 battery life drops significantly compared to the Pace 3. You only get 6 days of life with the Pace 4, compared to 15 days on the Pace 3.

(Photo/Andrew McLemore)

Navigation

Pace 4 has breadcrumb navigation, but no offline maps. That means you can get some help with directions. The breadcrumb-style navigation works just fine on streets — less so on trails. But for $50 more, you can get the Pace Pro, which does include that feature. This is likely a smart upsell strategy from COROS for those who want the additional navigation help.

But again, most people likely don’t need detailed turn-by-turn maps for daily workouts and neighborhood runs. Unless you want to expand into longer runs on unmarked trails, you likely don’t need the additional mapping available on the Pace Pro, Apex 4, or other, more expensive COROS models.

(Photo/Andrew McLemore)

In general, I found navigation on the Pace 4 to be sufficient when using it on city bike rides and daily runs. The watch also served me decently well during trail runs around Stone Mountain Park. However, there were moments on Stone Mountain’s Cherokee Loop Trail when I wished I had the additional mapping available on the Apex 4.

That’s not surprising, though, given that the Apex is specifically designed for trail runners. There are lots of smartwatches out there now, so it’s important to understand how each model serves different purposes.

Pace 4 Sport Watch: Other New Features

COROS also introduced a couple of other new features on the Pace 4, with mixed results. For starters, a software update released with the watch includes a Flashlight function. However, this is essentially just an extra bright, all-white display on the watch.

It’s helpful, and I can see why COROS introduced it. Garmin has added a built-in torch to its watches in recent years, and it proved far more useful than I expected during testing of the Garmin Crossover Instinct AMOLED. While I applaud COROS for trying to keep up, its light just can’t compete in usefulness.

The flashlight is bright, but not quite bright enough to light up the night; (photo/Andrew McLemore)

Another new addition is the ability to record voice notes. The Pace 4 includes a microphone, which allows for voice recording shortly after activities. Many athletes use voice notes to leave themselves reminders about how to improve. Once recorded, these voice notes are stored in the COROS app with the activity. They’re even transcribed for you, which is a nice addition.

I didn’t find myself using this feature too much, but I can see how it could be useful on longer trails. Notably, it’s also available on the Apex 4, where I imagine I’ll use it a bit more to remind myself about the complexities of tackling longer trails, like where to filter water or managing surprise obstacles like flooded trails or fallen trees.

What’s more notable than either of these updates? For me, the addition of media controls. Unlike the Pace 3, this newer model allows you to control music and media playing on your phone directly from the watch. That’s good news for any runner or cyclist who likes to keep listening without taking a break between songs or podcasts.

(Photo/Andrew McLemore)

Health Tracking

I’m probably far less focused on health tracking metrics than many other smartwatch users. That being said, I have found the data on sleep and heart rate to be helpful in managing day-to-day life. The Pace 4 reliably clocked my sleep and presented the data in an easy-to-understand format. Same goes for the HRV, or heart rate variability.

Though we’re all aware to some degree of our stress and energy levels, there is something undeniably helpful about reminders that we actually have to rest if we want to get better. The Pace 4’s sleep-, heart rate-, and stress-tracking features are sufficiently accurate to provide a big picture of what’s happening with our bodies.

And with the super-clear AMOLED display, perusing the watch’s various health data and graphs can even feel kinda fun. COROS has come a long way in terms of the accuracy of this data. I’d say the brand is nearly as accurate as Garmin — and far more accurate than the many cheaper smartwatch options now available.

(Photo/Andrew McLemore)

Testing Notes

So the Pace 4 isn’t a Garmin Fenix or even a COROS Vertix, the brand’s top-of-the-line fitness watch. The Pace 4 is meant for a broad audience, not the slim minority of athletes who need all the bells and whistles.

That comes through in the watch’s super slim, lightweight design. While the Pace 4 may not have the same mapping functionality as the Apex 4, it’s lighter and less bulky. And that’s pretty great when you’re wearing these watches most of the time.

(Photo/Andrew McLemore)

In my testing, the Pace 4 really shone at night, literally and figuratively. The AMOLED’s brighter colors really pop in the darkness. I wore both the Pace 4 and Apex 4 on several runs and bike rides, and I found myself looking to the Pace 4 more frequently — despite the improved mapping available on the Apex.

But when tackling a 5-mile loop trail on Stone Mountain, where there are many possible paths and limited signage, the Apex 4’s maps proved far more helpful than the breadcrumbs available on the Pace. So if you’re a road runner or cyclist seeking personal bests on tried-and-true courses, the Pace 4 is a solid choice. But trail runners and more backcountry adventurers will probably want an upgrade.

(Photo/Andrew McLemore)

Conclusion: Who’s It For?

If you’re looking for a solid sports watch for yourself or the athletic person in your family, the COROS Pace 4 won’t disappoint. Its battery life is better than Apple’s, its price is cheaper than Garmin’s, and the brand is clearly committed to improving its software at every opportunity.

While my colleague Nick Belcaster gave the Pace 3 a score of 6.5, I think this successor deserves a raise. With prices skyrocketing on nearly everything these days, it’s worth acknowledging a brand that’s giving more product with only a very small price increase. To be clear, the Pace 4 hasn’t improved from its predecessor in durability or navigation.

But most Pace 4 users will likely embrace the brighter display and improved software. For those looking for a general-use, midtier fitness watch that won’t empty your wallet, it’s hard to beat the Pace 4.

The Best Binoculars of 2025

Nick LeFort — Mon, 17 Nov 2025 16:59:04 +0000

Binoculars allow you to immerse yourself deeply in nature. They’re an expansive tool for any outdoor enthusiast, whether you’re a hiker, birder, stargazer, or hunter. The best binoculars will provide you with an up-close view and levels of detail you can’t experience with the naked eye.

Now is a better time than ever to purchase a set of binoculars, thanks to numerous technological advancements. There are image-stabilized binoculars that provide rock-solid images at high magnification, as well as binoculars that utilize unique materials to create a lighter, more compact model with large objective lenses. No matter what you’re looking for, there’s a perfect pair of binoculars for you.

The expert team of testers at GearJunkie has been using binoculars for decades. We’ve taken all of the binoculars on this list to the field, including new releases for 2025. Our testers relied on them for hunting, birding, stargazing, and general wildlife viewing. We paid close attention to optical clarity, weight, and low-light performance, and assessed overall value based on our field experiences.

With that experience, we compiled an extensive list of the best, ensuring you can find the right fit for your needs and budget. And if this is your first time purchasing binoculars, be sure to check out the included buyer’s guide section, which should clear up any confusion on a somewhat technical subject.

For dedicated hunters, check out our Best Hunting Binoculars Buyer’s Guide.

Editor’s Note: On November 14, 2025, GearJunkie updated this guide with new awards, and the inclusion of the Maven M.2 10X50 Monocular, and the SIG Zulu6 HDX 20X42. An extended rating system was also added to the guide.

The Best Binoculars of 2025

Best Overall Binoculars

ZEISS SFL 10X50

9.4/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Check Price at GOHUNT Check Price at Amazon

Best Budget Binoculars

Nocs Provisions Pro Issue 8×42

7.8/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Best Premium Binoculars

Swarovski NL Pure 10X42

9.1/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

$3,199 at Amazon

Check Price at Bass Pro

Best Binoculars under $150

Celestron Outland X 10×42

6.9/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

$120 at Amazon

Best Binoculars for Birdwatching

Nikon Monarch M5 8×42

8.0/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Check Price at REI

$280 at Amazon

Best Monocular

Maven M.2 12X50 Monocular

8.1/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Check Price at Maven

Best Binoculars for Hunting

Maven C.3 10×50

9.3/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

$500 at Maven

$575 at Amazon

Best Image Stabilizing Binoculars

SIG ZULU6 HDX 20×42

8/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Check Price at Sig Sauer Check Price at Scheels

Best Binoculars for Kids

NOCS Provisions Standard Issue 8×25

7.1/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

See more picks

9.4

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 15 oz.
Close focus range: 5.9'
Eye relief: 18 mm
Magnification: 10x
Objective lens: 50 mm
Field of view: 366'
Prism: Schmidt-Pechan (roof)

Pros

Size and weight (fits in standard bino harnesses)
Low light performance
Excellent clarity
Sensitive focus wheel
Eyecups highly adjustable
Price to quality

Cons

Provided case
Lens covers
Price
Weight when compared to all binoculars. But, light for a 10X50.

In April of 2025, German optics manufacturer ZEISS released the SFL 10X50 binocular ($1,799). After spending time in the field with them through the summer and fall, it became apparent that they deserved to claim the best overall spot in this guide. The performance of the SFL is right on par with that of other premium binoculars, and it comes at a high-value price.

Low-light performance is one of the strongest features of these binos. Some of the best wildlife viewing happens right at sunrise and as the sun sets below the horizon. In those low-light situations, a binocular with a 50 mm objective lens starts to stand out from the crowd. The larger lens gathers more light and delivers a brighter image than a 42mm lens, which allows users to discern far-off objects more easily.

The SFL offers these benefits and stands out due to its compact design. Most 10X50 binoculars gain mass in both weight and length of the tubes, but when stacked up to other 10X50s, the SFL is one of, if not the most compact and lightweight option. In fact, it’s so small that it’s almost the exact same size and weight as the Swarovski NL Pure 10X42s.

With a magnesium construction, thinner lenses, and smaller gaps between lenses, these binoculars offer all the benefits of a 10X50 binocular without the drawbacks of size. Tester Morgan Nowels found that the SFLs fit in every single binocular harness he owns, which is a huge plus. Most 10X50s require a larger harness, but not these.

As far as optical clarity goes, there isn’t much room for improvement. Over the course of two months of preseason deer scouting, Nowels found that the binos provide a crystal clear image edge-to-edge, thanks to the ultra-responsive focus wheel. Chromatic aberration, distortion, and glare are nonexistent. The viewing experience lives up to the price of these premium binos.

And honestly, the cost of $1,799 is very reasonable in the world of high-end optics. There are definitely more expensive options out there, but the gains in optical clarity are borderline imperceptible, and the drawbacks in bulk are glaring. For those looking for some of the best binoculars on the market, the ZEISS SFL 10X50 is a top contender.

Buy If: You need low-light performance, want top-tier clarity in a compact package, need to focus on subjects quickly, or have a high budget, but still want high value.

Pass If: Weight is important to you, your budget is limited, or you want the largest field of view (that goes to Swarovski).

7.8

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 8 oz.
Close focus range: 6’
Eye relief: 17 mm
Magnification: 8x
Objective lens: 42 mm
Field of view: 429’
Prism: Phase-coated BaK4 roof

Pros

Lightweight
Durable and easy to hold on to in all conditions
6’ close focus range
Better clarity than many budget binoculars

Cons

Not as optically clear as other options
Low light performance suffers

You don’t need to spend a ridiculous amount of money to get a set of solid binoculars, a fact proven by the NOCS Provisions Pro Issue ($329). Many budget options leave much to be desired, but these binoculars surprised tester Nick LeFort with solid optical clarity, except in low-light situations.

Earlier this summer, the Pro Issues came along to the Vermont Institute of Natural Science. Aside from being an all-around great place to explore, VINS has a unique forest canopy walk that takes you up and above the trees. Once you get up there, you can see everything for miles – and there’s a massive gap in the trees where the Ottauquechee River runs.

This area has a lot of bird and animal action depending on when you’re there. These binoculars provided a crisp and clear view of it all. What’s more, VINS was selling the entire line of NOCS Provisions products in their gift shop.

Since then, the Pro Issue has been a go-to for LeFort. With these binos in hand, he spotted a few deer off in the distance on an old and unused trail, and even did a little stargazing. In all instances and in all weather conditions, the Pro Issue binoculars outperformed all of the other binoculars (and monoculars) on this list. Their textured, rubber grip was a godsend, given that most of this summer has been wet.

For under $300, the NOCS Provisions Pro Issue binoculars are easily accessible for everyone; however, don’t expect them to be as crisp as our best overall pick, the ZEISS SFL. Whether you’re just looking to have fun with binoculars or if you take your birdwatching and sky-gazing seriously, you’ll love these binos. You’ll enjoy the 6-foot range of focus, which keeps things in your general area crisp and clear while benefiting from the 429 feet of view, which helps you catch any movement on the periphery.

Buy If: You’re on a budget and want good clarity, need durability, or are looking for your first set of binoculars.

Pass If: You need excellent low-light performance, or want the best optical clarity, and are willing to pay for it.

9.1

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 13.6 oz.
Close focus range: 6.6'
Eye relief: 18 mm
Magnification: 10x
Objective Lens: 42 mm
Field of view: 399'
Prisms: Roof

Pros

Incomparably crisp images even at long range
Wide field of view shows details throughout image
Work well in low light
Easy to hold, ergonomic design

Cons

Cost
Eye adjustment needs work
Mediocre warranty

The Swarovski NL Pure 10×42 Binoculars ($3,199) are a long-range, low-light workhorse with stellar glass. Our team has been using binoculars for decades and has tried them all. But the difference in quality (even compared to other high-end options like the Maven B1.2 8×42) was immediately clear when looking through these to check out a distant moose in Grand Teton National Park.

Thanks to a wide field of view and Swarovski’s innovative tech, the image transmitted through the NL Pures is much clearer, even at the edges, than others tested, including the Leupold BX-5 Santiam HD 10×42 Binoculars. SWAROVISION technology utilizes field flattener lenses that counteract curvature, ensuring sharpness from the center to the edges of the image. This means no refocusing is needed when moving your eye, so you don’t miss a detail.

With a 42 mm objective lens, the NL Pure 10x42s let in more light than the previous choice for best premium binoculars, the Maven B1.2 8×42. This means better viewing at dawn or dusk when wildlife is most active, on cloudy days, or in environments like the ocean or the Arctic where contrast is low.

Another big difference is their ergonomic design, which makes them enjoyable to hold for long periods of time. Flattened tubes where your hands fall and a textured no-slip grip make them easier to hold, even for people (or kids) with smaller hands. Though they’re the heaviest on the list, they’re well-balanced and somehow don’t feel too heavy even after holding them all day.

One place for improvement is the eye cups. They twist in and out through seven different options so you can find a comfortable and functional fit. However, the mechanism is tricky, and the eyepieces twisted off completely after a while. Though you can put them back on, it seems that when this happens once, it tends to be a chronic issue. Hopefully, Swarovski improves this feature.

The other downside is the warranty. While acceptable, a 10-year cap on mechanical issues and no accident coverage are kind of a bummer at this sky-high price. Check out our full guide to binocular warranties here!

At over $3,000, the price may be a barrier to purchase. However, these are binoculars you buy once and keep for life. They’re that good. If you’re looking for that long-term relationship with a pair of binoculars that delivers unsurpassed image quality and the best ergonomics and feel, take a look at the Swarovski NL Pure 10 x 42.

Buy If: You want the best, and price is no object.

Pass If: Having the best warranty is essential to you, you need something lightweight, or $3k for binoculars just ain’t in the cards.

6.9

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 2 lbs.
Close focus range: 14.8’
Eye relief: 18.2 mm
Magnification: 10x
Objective Lens: 42 mm
Field of View: 289’
Prism: Bak4 Roof

Pros

Most affordable adult binoculars on the list
Durable design
Compact size
Solid clarity
Easy to use
Ideal size

Cons

Sensitive adjustment knob
Edges of field of view are blurry
Neck strap is very long/leads to slack
Narrow field of view

The C elestron Outland X 10×42 Binoculars ($120) are priced so that people who are new to binoculars or folks looking for another pair can pick them up and enjoy them without a heavy investment. Though they may not be as premium as some other binos on this list, they’ve certainly earned their spot here. But don’t let their budget-friendly price fool you, you can still expect a quality build and clear optics from the Outland X.

The initial appeal of these binoculars is their compact size. But since our team tested them in the middle of one of the hottest and wettest summers on record, they needed to be both fog-proof and weather-resistant. If the Outland Xs could meet these demands, then they would be optimal for outdoor enthusiasts. After more than a month in the elements, they did.

However, there’s a flip side to every coin. First and foremost, these aren’t for star gazing like their sisters, the Celestron Skymaster Pro 15×70. Also, though the Outland X has a smooth focus wheel that provides crystal-clear imagery, the edges of the field of view are generally blurry. This increases at higher magnifications, which is even more noticeable in low light. These downsides wouldn’t deter us from continuing to use these binoculars, however, they’re worth mentioning.

Overall, the Celestron Outland X 10×42 Binoculars are for anyone looking to break into birdwatching or any outdoor activity where you need to get a clear view of things off in the distance.

Buy If: You’re jumping into the world of binoculars and are unsure if you’ll use them much, need a backup pair, or want something inexpensive that isn’t junk.

Pass If: You plan on using binoculars consistently.

8.0

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 6 oz.
Close focus range: 8.2'
Eye relief: 19.5 mm
Magnification: 8x
Objective lens: 42 mm
Field of view: 335'
Prism: Roof

Pros

Lightweight
Crisp, clear imagery in all lighting conditions
Durability

Cons

Average close range of focus

The Nikon Monarch M5 8×42 ($339) binoculars are legendary in the binocular world. They’re lightweight, durable, waterproof, and fogproof. Additionally, the visual experience is unparalleled, which is one of the reasons why they’re the best for birdwatching. With a price tag under $300, they’re giving some of the premium-priced binos a real run for their money.

The Monarch M5s, like their more expensive sibling — the M7s — are designed for users of all skill levels. They’re well adapted for hiking, sky gazing, and hunting, but the fact that they take very little adjusting or fine-tuning helped corral them into the birdwatching category. Additionally, while panning, the distortion is minimal. Nikon’s Extra-low Dispersion (ED) glass is designed to work while you’re on the move and in all light conditions.

During testing, following a hummingbird in flight and locking in on it while it hovered was a non-issue. Being the fastest and most elusive of birds, this was a major factor in the decision-making process.

But testing wasn’t just limited to the backyard. Even on rainy days and windy nights on the beach, these binos performed extremely well. Part of this is due to the rubber casing allowing you to keep a solid grip on them in all conditions.

That said, there were zero issues with fog, which is common of all of the binoculars on this list, but not of all binoculars. Our only complaint is the average close range of focus. If you’re looking for a higher-end option ideal for birdwatching, give the Vortex Viper HD 10×42 a try.

When it comes down to tracking down our feathered friends, half of the excitement is keeping up with them. The Monarch M5s were the cream of the crop for the job.

Buy If: You want the most compact, full-sized binocular.

Pass If: You want top-tier clarity.

8.1

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 4 oz.
Close focus range: 7.5'
Eye relief: 17.5mm
Magnification: 12X
Objective lens: 50mm
Field of view: 289'
Prism: Wide-angle Schmidt-Pechan

Pros

Very high-quality glass, but cheaper due to it being a monocular
Very compact — fits in a pocket, glove box, etc.
Excellent clarity
Great for low light
12X zoom is excellent for far distances, or gauging antler size
Surprisingly steady despite high zoom

Cons

Not tripod-adaptable
Heavy
Limited field of view
Expensive for monocular

High-quality glass meets unmatched portability in the Maven M.2 12X50 Monocular ($500). The optical clarity provided by this monocular is excellent, which Maven achieved by taking its premium binocular, the B.6, and eliminating one of the tubes.

GearJunkie contributor and hunter Morgan Nowels was admittedly skeptical about putting his trusty binoculars aside and relying solely on a monocular in the field. However, after a few hunts with the M.2, he began to see the light in investing in such a niche optic.

The M.2 is extremely unobtrusive. It easily fits in a jacket pocket or an exterior small pocket on a backpack. Feeling naked would be a good way to describe it, and it was freeing to ditch a clunky harness. Likewise, the compact nature makes this the perfect optic to leave in a truck glove box, always at the ready for wildlife viewing on a drive.

As far as optical clarity and low-light performance go, it’d be tough to find a monocular that can beat it. The image quality is excellent. It’s a great way to experience premium glass without the premium price tag, because you’re only paying for half of a binocular. And that is why the value of this optic is tough to nail down. On one hand, it’s a very expensive monocular. On the other hand, it’s dirt cheap for the level of optical performance you get.

There are downsides to it, some of which are flat-out negatives, and others that can be solved by moving to its smaller cousin, the M.1 10X42. The most glaring negative is that it isn’t tripod compatible. At first, Nowels was very concerned about that, because 12-powered optics are often shaky when free-handed. However, the M.2 was surprisingly stable and is easily used without support. It would still be nice to have the option for long glassing sessions, though. Eye fatigue also hits quicker with a monocular, but there’s really nothing to be done about that.

Additionally, the 12 power makes for a much narrower field of view, which can make it challenging to pick up targets instantly that you spotted with the naked eye. Thanks to the larger objective lens, the M.2 is also quite heavy, so while it is compact, it does have some heft.

But, when hunting, that 12-power is great when picking apart thick cover in search of an antler tine on a bedded buck, or easily identifying antler size at a distance. The M.2 is like having a micro spotting scope in your pocket at all times.

Buy If: You need something compact, you want to experience high-end optics without the price, you use optics intermittently throughout the day, or you are looking for “truck binos.”

Pass If: You need something for extended glassing sessions, such as spot-and-stalk hunting or a day of birding at a refuge.

9.3

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 12 oz.
Close focus range: 8.2’
Eye relief: 15 mm
Magnification: 10x
Objective Lens: 50 mm
Field of View: 250’
Prism: Roof

Pros

Great depth of imagery
Easy to adjust
Durable design

Cons

Narrow field of view

Choosing the best hunting binoculars is tough. For this list, to be totally honest, we were torn between three different sets of binos. Two of those were Mavens. The Maven C.3 10×50 binos ($550) won top honors for a few reasons. Where these binos beat out the competition is pretty clear. It all comes down to performance, price, weight, and low-light capability. The C.3 10x50s just outperforms in those categories with few drawbacks and offer a price-to-performance ratio that is just hard to overcome.

Okay, let’s dig into why the C.3s, a mid-tier, budget-friendly, unlikely candidate, made the top-honors spot. It all comes down to the perfect balance. There are other hunting binos on the list that have more reach but less low-light capability. Some of the other options offer better clarity but also tip the scales with heftier weights. The C.3s fall in that sweet spot of doing everything really well and not breaking the bank while doing it.

When it comes down to it, the only real drawback to this glass is a narrow field of view. You are going to have to scan just a bit more to cover your scene, which is something very few people will even notice.

In the end, the C.3s performed with incredible clarity, a rugged, comfortable feel, minimal weight, great reach, and incredible low-light capability — all at nearly a quarter of the price of much of the competition. We’re certainly of the opinion that glass is a good place to spend your money, but this is one of those few times that top price doesn’t always equal top performance.

Buy If: You’re a hunter or birder and want the best bang for the buck, or you need a well-rounded binocular.

Pass If: You want the best optical performance available.

Rating Details

Specifications

Magnification: 20x
Objective: 42mm
Eye Relief: 15mm
Linear FOV: Unspecified
FOV: 3.3 degrees
Weight: 1 lb., 5.9 oz.
Prism Style: Roof

Pros

Image stabilizing
Lightweight
Serious magnification
Extreme clarity

Cons

Loss of performance in low light conditions

Easily the most unique pair of binoculars on the list, the SIG ZULU6 HDX 20X42 ($1,199) has changed what binoculars are capable of. Thanks to electronic image stabilization technology, these binoculars offer impressive 20X magnification! In the past, that level of power was reserved only for tripod-mounted optics, due to the inherent instability of human hands.

The first look through the ZULUs is trippy. The technology works perfectly, and it can be a little odd to view something through binoculars with a rock-steady image. It is awe-inspiring.

Users can cycle through two modes: Scan Mode and Target Mode. Scan mode is best when you’re looking for your target. It’s very responsive to your movements and provides decent stability once you’ve found your target. But if you then switch into target mode, the image stabilization increases by over 50%. It can actually get difficult to get the image to move.

Now, the high zoom and image stabilization come with some tradeoffs. First, the binoculars are a bit bulky and oddly shaped. You may need to get a new bino harness to accommodate them. They also lack the low-light performance you can find with other binoculars on this list. And of course, high magnification can make target acquisition difficult.

Outside of those things, these are some sweet binoculars. If you want to have high magnification, it’s the only way to go. You’ll be impressed.

Buy If: You need high magnification, are using binoculars on a boat (whale watching, charter captains), or are a hunter looking to replace your bulky spotting scope and tripod.

Pass If: High magnification doesn’t suit your needs, or you regularly use binoculars in low light.

7.1

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 11.85 oz.
Close focus range: 13’
Eye relief: 10 mm
Magnification: 8x
Objective Lens: 25 mm
Field of View: 357’
Prism: BaK4 Roof

Pros

Size and weight is perfect for kids
Durable
Waterproof

Cons

No matter what, kids will smudge the lens
Poor low-light performance

Appeal might not be the first thing you think of when you think of binoculars, but when considering binoculars for kids, colors like Poppy, Canary, and Glacial can be a big draw. This was one of the factors considered when choosing the NOCS Provisions Standard Issue 8×25 ($100) for the best binoculars for kids.

Additionally, the $100 price tag, easy fine-tuning, and clarity were major deciding factors. You don’t have a long attention span with kids, so you need binoculars they like from the get-go.

The rubber coating on the Standard Issue binoculars isn’t only great for grip, but you’ll appreciate it when your kids drop them in the dirt and they bounce around on the ground. You’ll also be a fan of the IPX7 certified rating, which not only allows these binos to get wet but also allows them to be submerged for 30 minutes.

Our testers kids loved how lightweight and easy they were to use. A little goes a long way with the focus knob, but it’s not so sensitive that people of all ages will struggle to use them. They’re also easy to clean, which is important because little kid hands are always grubby and grimy. Based on their waterproof construction, you could dip them in the ocean and wipe them down with a towel. Easy peasy.

Even though the Standard Issue’s award is aimed at kids, adults will also enjoy these binoculars. For less than $100 and with a close focus range of 13 feet, there will be some distortion, especially right in front of your field of view. However, the compact size and light weight make them a great pair of binos for casual use.

Buy If: You have kids and don’t trust them with your binoculars, or need a durable, super-compact option that you can take anywhere.

Pass If: You’re looking for a do-all, primary set of binoculars, or will be in any form of low-light.

7.8

Rating Details

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 5.2 oz.
Close focus range: 5'
Eye relief: 17 mm
Magnification: 8x
Objective lens: 42 mm
Field of view: 393'
Prisms: Roof

Pros

Incredible value for the quality of optics
Great viewing
Excels in low light
Excellent warranty and customer service

Cons

Focus wheel and right eye diopter are a bit clunky
Included harness is not the easiest to use
Phenomenal warranty

The Diamondback HD binoculars by Vortex ($240) were one of the hottest runner-ups in this guide. These optics are highly impressive for the price, and with an ironclad warranty, they’re a favorite among hunters for a reason. In fact, Tester Morgan Nowels used a set of these for four hunting seasons before feeling the need to upgrade.

Users should always prioritize lens quality when buying a pair of binoculars. In this category, Vortex is especially hard to beat. The brand’s patented HD optics are designed to give the ultimate viewing experience in terms of resolution, sharpness, light capture, and color fidelity. These binoculars offer good clarity, which is suitable for most users, although not the best. If you want the best, jump into some of Vortex’s more expensive models or other premium picks on this list. But for the price, the Diamondback HD is tough to beat.

Further, binoculars are often tossed in backpacks or exposed to the elements on the trail. Vortex recognizes this and has protected its Diamondback HD lenses with ArmorTek to shield them from grime, dirt, oil, scratches, and anything else that could compromise the viewing experience.

Beyond the optics, the Diamondback HD binoculars’ build is tough to beat. At their core, these binoculars are light and durable, and the outer rubber coating adds an extra layer of protection and grip. In the event that something does happen to them, Vortex will be sure you’re taken care of with one of the best warranties in the optics world.

Vortex excels in the accessory department, as the Diamondbacks are compatible with both car window mounts and tripod adaptors to help steady the optics when viewing. Like many other binos, Vortex packages its binoculars with a neck strap, lens covers, and a protective case and harness. The only downsides? A tricky-to-manage harness and a few clunky elements on the binoculars themselves.

When considering the best binoculars available, the difference between these and our other top choices is subjective — they’re hard to beat.

Buy If: You’re on a budget, and want a warranty that backs your purchase no matter what.

Pass If: You expect silky-smooth, easy-to-use adjustments or top-of-the-line optical performance.

7.5

Specifications

Weight: 8.9 oz.
Close focus range: 7.4’
Eye relief: 15 mm
Magnification: 8x
Objective Lens: 32 mm
Field of View: 405’
Prism: BaK4 Roof

Pros

Compact and lightweight
Durable and submersible
Tripod compatible

Cons

More susceptible to shaky hands

Read Review: Pocket Sized and Powerful Enough: Nocs Provisions Field Tube Review

While binoculars are fantastic, sometimes a lightweight monocular is better. For day-to-day adventures, the NOCS Provisions Field Tube 8×32 ($130) is a favorite of the GearJunkie crew.

These are the one-eyed version of the NOCS Field Issue binoculars, designed for all users, in all environments, and in all scenarios. In binocular form, the Field line fits in between the Standard Issue and Pro Issue lines. They represent the best of both worlds in terms of magnification, weight, clarity, and price. Now take one side off, and increase the ease of use by having to only use one eyeball.

Previously the Nocs Provisions Zoom Tube 8×32 ($75) was ranked as the best monocular. However, the Field Tube is a well-rounded and overall improvement over the Zoom Tube. It has an increase in IPX rating (from IPX4 to IPX7), in the field of view (384’ to 405’), and overall clarity. However, with that comes a price increase of $50.

The Field Tube quickly found its way into our testers daypack, and it hasn’t left since. That was partly because it’s compact enough to fit in a water bottle pocket, and monoculars are easy to dial in and track something out in the field. There’s no need to adjust the width to get both eyes comfortable. You just pick your preferred eye and move the focus knob.

8.7

Testing emergency radios in Colorado; (photo/Mallory Paige)

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 10.7 oz.
Close focus range: 4.9’
Eye relief: 18.1 mm
Magnification: 8x
Objective Lens: 42 mm
Field of View: 420’
Prism: Wide Angle Roof

Pros

Best visual experience
Affordable compared to premium competitors
Durable

Cons

Expensive for the casual user

You might think that at nearly a thousand dollars, the Maven B1.2 8×42 ($1,150) binoculars are wicked expensive – and generally speaking, you’re right. However, in the world of premium binoculars, this is a bargain. Maven makes some of the highest-quality binoculars available. From the field of view to the clarity to the overall build — the B1.2s are Maven’s flagship binos for a reason.

Aside from its durable, waterproof, and fog-proof design, the Maven B1.2 binoculars offer incredibly crisp and clear images. They were even a tad bit sharper than some of the highest-priced pairs on the list.

Where most other binoculars suffer from some level of edge distortion, the B1.2s do not. You might not think this is a big deal, but when you’re trying to zero in on a particular subject, they eliminate the need to move your head when something appears at the perimeter of your field of view. Which, by the way, is 420 feet — giving you a considerable landscape to explore without distortion.

It would be a stretch to say that the B1.2s are compact, but they are smaller than the original B.1 binoculars that they are based on. When it comes down to carrying something around your neck or having to sit still and stare through it for a while, weight and balance become a factor. That is unless you want to carry around a tripod, but for $950, you don’t want to have to invest any more money.

The big picture here is that though the B1.2s are incredibly easy to use by people of all skill levels, they’re made for people who use and rely on their binoculars more than the average user.

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 8.6 oz.
Close focus range: 5’
Eye relief: 17 mm
Magnification: 10x
Objective lens: 42 mm
Field of view: 341'
Prism: Roof

Pros

Close focus for birding, optical technology
Simple and elegant design
Industry-best warranty

Cons

Wear down with heavy use
Expensive

Every serious birdwatcher has a personal preference for the best binoculars for birding. However, most would agree that the ideal pair should have magnification in the 8x to10 x range to spot birds at a distance while still maintaining a relatively stable hand. Further, binoculars with objective lenses in the 42mm range let in adequate light while promoting contrast in the field of view.

If you want a pair of binoculars that also has a short focus to enable easy observation of the many intricate and beautiful details of avian anatomy, then you’ve found a solid pair in the Viper HD 10×42 binoculars by Vortex ($650).

The simple and elegant design is durable and light, making it a no-brainer to bring them on every birdwatching adventure. The price may sting a little, but if you’re a serious birder, it’s a small price to pay for quick identification in the field.

HD glass allows for incredible crispness in the field of view and maximizes light capture in low-light conditions. The rubber coating has become a staple of the Vortex line and provides added strength and grip on the Vipers as well, and the adjustable eyecups promote comfort for everybody.

Specifications

Weight: 1 lbs., 12 oz.
Close focus range: 13.5'
Eye relief: 15 mm
Magnification: 10x
Objective lens: 42 mm
Field of view: 342'
Prisms: Abbe-Koenig

Pros

Tough magnesium body
Field-replaceable eyecups
Built-in tripod adapter port for easy glassing

Cons

Eyecups don't hold position the best
Included binocular harness isn't the most comfortable

Built to get you glassing and still have enough gas in the tank to get there, the Leupold BX-2 Alpine HD 10×42 ($250) is a favorite in hunting circles for its above-average optical quality, tough magnesium body, and sub-$300 price tag. Available in 8x, 10x, and 12x magnifications (we suggest the 10x for an all-arounder) and 42mm and 52mm objective lens sizing, there’s a pair for whatever you’re after — whether that’s from a tree stand or in wide-open country.

The BX-2 Alpines are built around Leupold’s ‘Advanced Optical’ system, which is its base-tier prism and lens setup and consists of Abbe-Koenig roof prisms and calcium fluoride lenses. While not as tack-sharp as the BX-5 Santiams we tested concurrently, it’d be unfair to say that the BX-2s aren’t a sharp piece of optics. We did miss out on the hydrophobic lens coating that higher-end Leupold models receive, however.

The central focusing dial provides smooth feedback, and that’s mirrored by an equally smooth open-bridge hinge. The eyecups, too, move smoothly, but they were a bit soft in terms of staying in place in our pair, and we had to take care not to lean too hard into the optics while glassing. Even still, the ability to field-replace the eyecups helps make up for the fact, and it’s a facet that should keep deep-backcountry hunters happy.

For $250, it’s tough for us not to recommend the Leupold BX-2 Alpines — the Vortex Diamondbacks would be another like-recommendation of ours, but those will cost you an extra $80, and have a slightly narrower field of view. For the price, though, the BX-2 earns its reputation well.

Specifications

Weight: 3 lbs., 3 oz.
Close focus range: 49.2'
Eye relief: 17 mm
Magnification: 15x
Objective lens: 70 mm
Field of view: 231'
Prisms: BaK-4 Porro

Pros

Large objective lenses gather light from night sky
Tripod and red dot finder mounts
Fully coated optics with BaK-4 prisms

Cons

Difficult to keep still while handheld

High-powered stargazing isn’t limited to just telescopes, and a good pair of astro-binoculars like the Celestron Skymaster Pro 15×70 ($280) is both an affordable and accurate view piece to seeing far into the night sky.

While many other binoculars on our list have a magnification of 8 or 10, the Skymasters punch it in to 15, providing the necessary zoom to see deep into space. The 70mm objective lens size is also larger than most to make space for as much light as possible. After setting the separation between the eyes on these binoculars, it was easy to view parts of the sky the naked eye could only dream to spy.

The housing is made up of polycarbonate and aluminum, and clad in a rubber sheath that helps to keep bumps and bruises minimal. The whole kit is waterproofed as well, with dry nitrogen gas within the lenses to prevent fogging. When testing these binoculars recently deep in the North Cascades, stars jumped out with surprising color and clarity. You should be able to pick out larger and brighter galaxies through these binoculars on clear nights.

While holding these binoculars by hand will work, most users will find using a mono- or tripod to be the ticket for long star viewings, and the Skymaster includes a tripod mount for getting it rigged up. The bracket itself is metal and sturdy enough, though the included screw will slip a bit when fully torquing it down.

When used with a tripod, the binos also sport a “Reflex Sight Ready” rail, which allows for a red dot finder to be used in sighting in on celestial objects. Perfect for catching a glimpse of what the night sky holds, the Skymaster Pro 15x70s open up the heavens for binocular users. Catch the astronomy bug? Bumping up to the Skymaster Pro 20×80 will net you a supreme stargazing experience (at a higher price tag).

Specifications

Weight: 9.9 oz.
Close focus range: 8.2'
Eye relief: 10 mm
Magnification: 8x
Objective lens: 25 mm
Field of view: 429'
Prisms: Roof

Pros

Compact
Budget-friendly
Lightweight

Cons

Not the best in low light
Narrower-feeling field of view

If you’re looking for compact, folding binoculars, look no further than the Nikon Trailblazer 8×25 ATB Binoculars ($120).

This pair is pint-sized but packs a punch. It easily fits in the palm of your hand or your pocket — making it an ideal companion for backpacking, squeezing into a glovebox, or heck, throwing it in a running vest or fishing waders in case you wander across something cool. These compact binos are even perfect for a ski touring pack, where they can be used to scope out avalanche activity and lines in the distance.

Larger, pricier models have more bells and whistles that might be important when a top-quality image is paramount. The Trailblazer, for example, has a narrower objective diameter — 25 mm — than other favorites on this list. A broader objective diameter means a lens has greater light-collecting power and, as a result, a brighter and higher resolution image. Don’t expect the crispest image at dawn or dusk.

But the design works well as a less bulky option for the casual birdwatcher. These binoculars are especially well-suited for smaller hands and kids, too.

You won’t regret throwing the Nikon Trailblazer in your pack or sling bag. You’ll barely know it’s there until you need it.

Specifications

Weight: 1 lb., 8.3 oz.
Close focus range: 5'
Eye relief: 16.6 mm
Magnification: 10x
Objective lens: 42 mm
Field of view: 341'
Prisms: Multi-coated roof

Pros

Tack-sharp optical quality
DiamondCoat 2 lens treatment bumps up light transmission and abrasion-resistance
Guard-Ion hydrophobic treatment on lenses is excellent
Oversized eyepieces

Cons

Lens covers aren't the highest-quality

The top-of-the-line from Leupold, the BX-5 Santiam HD 10×42 Binoculars ($1,000) well earned the price tag in our testing. These binoculars get the full treatment when it comes to optical clarity and incorporate Leupold’s Professional-Grade Optical System — a setup that blew us away in the field.

That quality all comes via the open-bridge roof prism design, which has been fully multi-coated on all sides of the prisms for the best reflection control. Those prisms also boast phase coatings to represent true color through the glass better, and the whole affair is protected by the DiamondCoat 2 treatment on the objective lenses — a coating that greatly bumps up the abrasion-resistance — and Leupold’s Guard-Ion hydrophobic treatment.

With binos, what’s on the outside is often as important as what’s on the inside, and the magnesium and rubber-armored body on the Santiams is up to the task. We also truly appreciated the oversized eyecups and eye relief on this set, as it made long glassing sessions more tolerable.

The included padded bino case (unfortunately, not quite as nice as other Leupold binocular harnesses) works well enough and keeps these optics close at hand.

Comparing the Leupold BX-5 Santiam to other high-end binoculars like the Maven B1.2 feels like a futile effort — good glass is just good glass — but we did find the Mavens were just a bit sharper across the entire field of view. Our testers also didn’t find the eye cups on the Santiams to be the most comfortable, but this wasn’t a dealbreaker. Critiques aside, the Santiams are a high-end piece of glass that will impress nearly anyone.

Binoculars Comparison Chart

Binoculars	Price	Weight	Field of View	Eye Relief	Magnification
ZEISS SLF 10X50	$1,799	1 lb., 15 oz.	366′	18 mm	10x
NOCS Provisions Pro Issue 8×42	$329	1 lb., 8 oz.	429’	17 mm	8x
Swarovski NL Pure 10X42	$3,199	1 lb., 13.6 oz.	399′	18 mm	10x
Celestron Outland X 10 ×42	$120	2 lbs.	289′	18.2 mm	10x
Nikon Monarch M5 8×42 Binoculars	$339	1 lb., 6 oz.	335′	19.5 mm	8x
Maven M.2 12X50 Monocular	$500	1 lb., 4 oz.	289′	17.5 mm	12x
Maven C.3	$550	1 lb., 12 oz.	251-262′	15 mm	10x, 12x
SIG ZULU6 HDX 20X42	$1,199	1 lb., 5.9 oz.	Not specified	15 mm	20x
NOCS Provisions Standard Issue 8×25	$100	11.85 oz	357’	10 mm	8x
Vortex Diamondback HD 8×42	$240	1 lb., 5.2 oz.	393′	17 mm	8x
NOCS Provisions Field Tube 8×32	$130	8.9 oz.	405’	15 mm	8x
Maven B1.2	$1,150	1 lb., 10.7 oz.	347-420′	8.1 mm	8x
Vortex Viper HD 10×42	$650	1 lb., 8.6 oz.	341′	17 mm	10x
Leupold BX-2 Alpine HD 10×42	$250	1 lbs., 12 oz.	342′	15 mm	10x
Celestron Skymaster Pro 15×70	$280	3 lbs., 3 oz.	231′	17 mm	15x
Nikon Trailblazer 8×25	$120	9.9 oz.	429′	10 mm	8x
BX-5 Santiam HD 10×42 Binoculars	$1000	1lb., 8.3 oz.	341′	16.6mm	10x

How We Scored and Assessed Binoculars

The eyecups on the ZEISS SFL has a broad range of adjustability; (photo/Morgan Nowels)

When looking at binoculars, we assessed what we believe to be the four most critical factors for a wide range of users: value, size, clarity, and low-light performance.

Value: How far is your dollar going? Some budget binoculars really outshine others in their price range, and some high-end binoculars demand really high prices, with only marginal improvements in performance.

Size: Size gets a little complicated. For the most part, it comes down to how compact a binocular is overall compared to the other options on the list. However, there are some standouts, like the ZEISS SFL, that are overall heavy and large, but score well because they’re very compact for a 10X50 binocular.

Clarity: This will give you a general idea of how clear an image is. The top-scoring options (nine and above) have no fringing on the edges, no chromatic aberration, and no glare, even in bright light situations.

Low-light performance: Some binoculars, especially 10X50s, gather more light, allowing you to discern objects more clearly as light fades. Others lose less light in the process of transmitting the reflected image to your eye. Those that performed best at dawn and dusk got high marks.

Overall Score: The overall score isn’t an average of the above scores. Because well, it doesn’t have to be. By not making this an average, we were able to capture the “it” factor that some binos have, and provide a better overall picture of the binocular. For example, the Swarovski NL Pure suffered in Value and Size scores, but on performance alone, it’s one of the best. So we broke the rules and scored it accordingly.

How We Tested the Best Binoculars

(Photo/Nick Belcaster)

The Testing Process

At GearJunkie, we understand the importance of binoculars delivering crisp, reliable vision. They also need to be durable and easy to use. Whether you’re chasing down hummingbirds in your backyard, scouting for a bull elk, or glassing the night sky, you need to be able to do it efficiently and effectively.

Our team tested over a dozen binoculars (and a couple of monoculars) to determine how they performed for various uses, budgets, and hand sizes. We focused on differences at sunrise and sunset to analyze low-light performance. Many hours were spent going back and forth between sets, paying close attention to image clarity, checking for chromatic aberration, and glare in bright light situations.

Finally, we took them out for actual field use. Whether we were hiking, birding, or on a hunting trip, we packed binos along, and at times, tested durability beyond what most people would be comfortable with. We combined our diverse experiences with a deep background in optics to determine value and provide our recommendations.

Our Expert Testers

(Photo/Erika Courtney)

Reviewer Nick LeFort leads the charge on this guide. An avid outdoors enthusiast, he’s no stranger to the need for a good pair of binoculars. He also knows how to use them. He spent the year testing out all of the binoculars on this list in a variety of environments and conditions. The whole time, the weather was hot and humid, which would have made any undeserving optics fog up and fail.

To make his final decisions, he focused on clarity, size and weight, field of view, and durability. He also enlisted the help of his daughters to ensure that the binos we picked for kids were certified by actual kids, not a long-haired kid at heart in his forties.

Kylie Mohr brings an additional perspective and knows the value of top-of-the-line binoculars firsthand. As an environmental journalist, she has accompanied snowy owl researchers out into the field in search of the beloved bird. Mohr spent long hours staring into binoculars, looking for a flash of white on the brown and green tundra. Cold hands and biting wind made easy-to-adjust models extra important, and high-powered magnification was essential to find nest sites.

GearJunkie writer Morgan Nowels is a passionate hunter. Binoculars go with him on every hunt, whether it’s in search of backcountry elk, whitetail deer, or chasing small game like ducks and squirrels. Having hunted seven different states in the last five years, he knows what works and what doesn’t. He’s used binos in every condition imaginable, and also contributes to our Best Hunting Binoculars guide.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose the Best Binoculars

Choose a pair of binoculars based on how you’ll use them and who will use them. The NOCS Provisions Standard Issue 8×25 are perfect for kids; (photo/Nick LeFort)

All binoculars are unique. Even within a brand, there can be a variety of aspects that make them completely different from one another. There are many different features and measurements to consider when trying to find the best binoculars for you. By working through our list and prioritizing your needs, finding the best binoculars for your needs should be simple.

How Do Binoculars Work?

Put simply, a binocular magnifies an image by utilizing three separate optical components: the ocular lens, the objective lens, and the prisms. These three pieces of glass work in concert to take in light, flip it, and project it for your viewing pleasure.

Those new to buying binoculars will notice a few significant numbers while shopping through different options. The magnification power, followed by the objective lens diameter, is the number you see presented as “8×40” or “10×42,” and it communicates very important bits of information.

Magnification

An 8x magnification worked dandy to punch in on this Icelandic volcanic eruption; (photo/Erika Courtney)

The first number is magnification, and is relatively easy to understand. This number indicates how many times closer what you’re viewing will appear to you. A set of binoculars with 8x magnification makes objects appear 8x closer. A set of binoculars with 10x magnification makes objects appear 10x closer.

This magnification is thanks to the ocular lens, a concave lens that blows up the image coming into the binoculars from the outer objective lens.

While you may think that a higher magnification is best, there are some downsides. First and foremost, binoculars with a higher magnification are more difficult to hold steady. There’s a reason most of our recommendations are eight and 10-powered: going higher than that will result in a shaky image while free-handing binoculars. Higher-powered binoculars work best in conjunction with a tripod for steady viewing.

Oftentimes, a higher magnification results in a smaller field of view (more on that later). This means users will spend more time “searching” for the object they’re trying to view.

Objective Lens Size

At a stated 8×42 magnification, the Nikon Monarch M5 8×42 sport an 8x magnification power, and 42mm objective lens. The Nikon Trailblazer 8 x 25 has the same magnification with a 25mm objective lens; (photo/Nick LeFort)

The second number, the objective lens size, is a bit more complicated. At a basic level, measuring objective lenses gives you an idea of how bulky the binoculars are to handle. Larger objective lenses will almost always result in a heavier and significantly larger body, with the ZEISS SFL 10X50 being the rare exception.

Perhaps more importantly, this number indicates the length in millimeters across the lens and, in turn, how much light your binoculars let in when viewing. Higher numbers mean larger lenses and more light, resulting in brighter images. Binoculars with smaller objective lenses are smaller and more portable.

Binoculars like the Celestron Skymaster Pro 15X70 have a large objective lens, allowing them to gather as much light as possible, making them an excellent choice for viewing stars at night. Compact binoculars such as the Nikon Trailblazer 8X25 ATB are packable but will struggle to provide a good image in low-light conditions.

In most lighting conditions, the differences are minimal. But, when the light starts to get really low, such as the hour and a half after official sunset, the difference in binoculars with a large objective lens becomes exponentially more apparent. If you plan on using binoculars in those situations, the value of a larger objective lens can’t be overstated.

Prisms, Optical Coatings, and Glass Type

The Nikon Monarch M5 sports high-end roof prisms that are multicoated for stellar visual clarity; (photo/Kylie Mohr)

Prisms are the final component of the binocular puzzle. When light refracts through a concave surface, like the objective lenses, the prism turns the image upside-down. Prisms right the image for final viewing.

We can divide prism design into two subcategories: Porro prisms and roof prisms. Without delving too deeply into each technology, Porro prism binoculars typically have a wider field of view, better depth perception, and more contrast.

Binoculars that use a Porro prism have offset eyepieces and objective lenses. The Celestron Outland 10×42 (as well as a few others on this list) share the same type of Porro prism and provide an incredible viewing experience.

Roof prism binoculars are a more comfortable shape to handle, with lenses and prisms aligned inside the binoculars themselves. This allows the binoculars they reside in to be more compact and durable, as the design is more stable. These designs are more expensive because special reflective coatings must be used to minimize the inherent loss of light caused by the design.

Optical Coatings

Lenses without optical coatings can bounce errant light around, creating a blurry and glare-prone pair of optics. These coatings are applied to both sides of the lens, tamping down some wavelengths of light and allowing for a clear beam of light to pass through them.

Optical coatings are applied in either single or multiple layers, with a multi-coat lens being superior optically. Prisms are also coated with optical coatings, with roof prisms receiving both a reflective coating and a phase-correction coating that ensures high-contrast images.

Lens Type

The types of glass used in both the lenses and prisms can also have a large effect on the overall clarity of your binoculars, and aiming for high quality here is also the best bet. Common formulations are BaK-4, also known as barium crown glass, or BK-7, a cheaper alternative. If a perfect view is what you’re after, aim for BaK-4.

Extra-low Dispersion Glass, or ED glass, helps to limit color defects that can occur when light splits up slightly after passing through the lens system. This is a more expensive glass often found in higher-end binoculars.

Field of View

We would far rather view these Alaskan grizzlies through a good pair of binoculars than up close and personal; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

The field of view is a critical piece to consider when buying binoculars. The field-of-view measurement denotes the width you’ll be viewing through your lenses. Our favorite binos for birdwatching, the Nikon Monarch M5 8×42, and our favorite premium pair, the Swarovski NL Pure 10X42s, were especially notable for their crisp and clear field of view.

A wide field of view allows users to see more of an area, whereas a smaller field of view zooms into a smaller geographical space. The relationship between objective lenses, magnification, and binocular design, in general, plays into the field of view measurement.

The field of view is presented in either feet or degrees. Most high-quality binoculars have a field of view between 6 and 8 degrees, or 300-400 feet when viewing a spot 1,000 yards away.

If you wear glasses, it should be noted that binoculars with a wide field of view often have shorter relief and may not be the best choice.

Optical Adjustments

Manipulating the eye cups on the Carson VX Series 8×42 Binoculars is easy, even with gloves on; (photo/Kylie Mohr)

Eye Relief

Eye relief is most significant for those who wear eyeglasses, but it applies to all binocular users who might not immediately understand that a small gap between their eyes and the eyepieces is necessary to see the entire field of view.

The distance your eye should be away from the eyepiece typically measures between 5 and 20 mm. Eyeglass-wearers should seek out binoculars with an eye relief measurement long enough to accommodate their glasses, which is typically at least 10 mm. At 19.5 mm, the Nikon Monarch M5 has the most eye relief of all our favorite binos.

If you don’t wear glasses but have found the perfect pair of binoculars that happen to have long eye relief, don’t fret! Most binoculars have extendable rubber-coated eyecups. This serves as a correction and makes binoculars usable for both those with and without glasses.

Interpupillary Distance

Everyone’s face is different, and because of that, you’ll need to set the distance between your eyes (or, the interpupillary distance) to ensure that the image you see is combined between the barrels.

To do this, simply compress or expand the barrels of the binoculars together or apart until your eyes can comfortably see through both eyepieces. This will marry the two images together into one cohesive view.

Diopter Focus Adjustment

In the same way that pupil distance can vary, so can the actual focus between each eye. Because of this, dialing in the focus between the barrels of your binoculars is a surefire way to ensure you don’t get double vision during long viewing sessions.

Most binoculars worth their salt will incorporate a diopter adjustment ring into the eyepiece of one barrel of the binos to accommodate for the variations in focus. To set it, first set the diopter ring (commonly on the right eyepiece) to zero. Then, view through the binoculars with only the barrel that does not have the diopter ring, either by closing your other eye or blocking it with your hand. Using the focus wheel, bring the image into sharp focus.

Once your focus is set in your non-adjustable barrel, then uncover the diopter barrel and use the ring to dial in the focus until it is sharp in that eye as well, while covering the barrel you’ve already adjusted. Once you’ve completed this, both eyes should be adjusted for a crisp, clear image from both barrels.

Collimation

Binoculars are tools, and since a good tool is meant to be used, they can become knocked out of alignment from time to time. Specifically, the internal prisms can sometimes become unphased with one another, meaning that the image seen is blurred or doubled. To fix this, you’ll need to collimate your binoculars, which we assure is a much more frightening word for bringing images into alignment.

To be clear, collimation is most often best left to the professionals, and consulting your warranty is an excellent first step toward getting your binoculars collimated. Collimation can also be attempted at home, but this is outside of the scope of this review.

Close Focus Range

Packing deep into the Chugach Range of Alaska requires trimming pack weight, and a monocular is a great way to bring good optics with you without going over weight; (photo/Chris Anders)

Virtually all makes and models of binoculars prioritize focusing on objects in the distance. However, all binoculars are also capable of focusing on items much closer.

The close focus range on a pair of binoculars is the measurement given to the closest distance that a specific pair of binoculars can focus. This distance enables users to examine intricate details of nearby objects. This distance is at least 25 feet for most binoculars.

The close focus range of higher-quality binos comes in at under 10 feet, with the Vortex Viper HD 10×42 having the closest range — 5.1 feet — on this list. Great for getting up close and personal with whatever you’re sighting!

Exit Pupil and Relative Brightness

Viewing the exit pupil through the Nocs Zoom Tube; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

The exit pupil is the small pinpoint of light seen in the eyepieces when you hold them at a distance. The larger the diameter of this pinpoint, the more light that is allowed to pass through. This figure is easy to calculate by dividing the objective lens diameter by the magnification power.

For example, a pair of 8×42 binoculars would yield an exit pupil of 5.3 mm. This number can be used to compare binoculars and the relative brightness of the image they provide.

Packed Size & Weight

Sure they’ll both help you see far, but the Maven C.3 10×50 and the Nikon Trailblazer 8×25 are very different; (photo/Nick LeFort)

Depending on your desired use, the size and weight could be key considerations. When you’re hiking and hunting, having the lightest pair possible will make trekking that much more enjoyable. We also like having a small pair handy in the car in case a good animal peeping opportunity arises. Our favorite compact binoculars for adults are the Nikon Trailblazer 8×25 Binoculars, NOCS Provisions Standard Issue 8×25, and the much pricier Maven C.3.

Warranty

A solid warranty is often overlooked when purchasing outdoor equipment. That shouldn’t be the case in your search for binoculars. Binoculars are technical pieces of outdoor equipment that may endure some unintended abuse. If you spend big bucks on them, you need to ensure that the investment is protected.

To give a brief rundown, Vortex, Maven, and Leupold have the best warranties. These brands cover everything, including accidental breakage, for life. No receipt is needed, and no questions are asked.

Swarovski and Nikon cover defects, but not accidents. Other brands offer warranties that fall somewhere in the middle or vary depending on the specific product being purchased.

If you want an in-depth look at the warranty policy of the binoculars you’re looking at purchasing, check out Hunt/Fish Editor Rachelle Schrute’s “The Ultimate Binocular Warranty Comparison: Who’s Is Best?” article.

Price & Value

Comparing binoculars; (photo/Mallory Paige)

Binoculars on our list range in price from around $90 to $3,000. While the cheaper pairs that we recommend on this list are high quality relative to their price (or they’re for kids), it is important to realize that there is a reliable relationship between price and overall quality of glass. If you’re seeking high-quality binoculars able to hold up to active use and the elements, we recommend investing in the best pair you can afford.

Budget

The lower-priced options ($90-125) on our list include binoculars for children, monoculars from NOCs, and our budget pick, the Celestron Outland X 10×42 Binoculars ($105), which are a good entry pair of binoculars.

With budget binoculars, you won’t get the clearest image, and you may find they’ll fog up occasionally due to a lack of coatings. But, for a pretty low price, you can start to see things in the outdoors that you’ve been missing for years.

Mid-Tier

Spending a bit more can get you a lot more in the binocular realm, and for $250-300, there are plenty of excellent options. Typically, those that fall in this tier will have better glass and improved durability, including higher IPX ratings.

Our best overall pick, the NOCS Provisions Pro Issue ($295), is still a killer value given its extended field of view, close focus range, and overall adaptability between activities. The Nikon Monarch M5 8×42 ($270) excels in all light conditions and requires very little adjusting, making it ideal for birdwatching where you need to be fast on your feet.

The Vortex Diamondback HD binoculars ($240) have above-average optical quality, which means they compete with any other binos on the market. And, if you want a pair suited for the night sky, check out the Celestron Skymaster Pro 15×70 ($260).

You may find some binoculars in this price range lose some performance compared to their higher-end counterparts in low-light conditions.

Premium

Top-of-the-line binoculars can range from $500 to $5,000. The ones on our list top out at $3,000. At this price point, you’ll get the best glass available. The pricier the pair, the better the glass, and typically, the better they perform in low-light conditions; however, this may not mean they are better suited for how you want to use them.

Our favorite premium binoculars, the Swarovski NL Pures ($2,999) have a stellar field of view, the clearest glass and a durable build that will last. Others in this realm, the Maven C.3 10×50 ($500) and the Viper HD 10×42 binoculars by Vortex ($650), have top-of-the-line glass that allows you to see details with great clarity.

Premium binoculars will provide noticeably clearer views of distant objects. A prime example is when a member of our team was out with a wildlife photographer. They were out trying to capture images of mountain goats. While looking through the budget binoculars from the truck, our team member was trying to decipher whether what he was looking at was a mountain goat or a patch of snow. When he picked up a premium set of binos, it was instantly clear that it was just a patch of snow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Binoculars have both a magnification number (or strength), and a size (the diameter of the objective lens), which is most often expressed as a combination of two figures, such as 8×42 or 12×50.

The magnification number is the first figure given and relates how much closer images through the binoculars will appear. For example, many of the binoculars in our review provide an 8x or 10x magnification, where images appear 8 to 10 times closer than they are.

Higher magnification numbers will provide a more punched-in view, but oftentimes can be more difficult to hold steady. We’ve found that an 8x binocular is ideal for viewing landscapes, and that a 10x can aid in spying small wildlife like birds.

The lens size ultimately tells you how much light the binoculars are able to gather, and can be thought of as the aperture on a camera. The larger the lens size, the more light can be allowed in.

When choosing the magnification for your binoculars, you need to consider how you’ll primarily use them. As an outdoor site, we would recommend everyone to purchase binoculars with a minimum magnification of 7x.

Binoculars with high magnification, such as 10x or greater, are suitable for long-distance viewing. These are often the go-to choice for hunters and the most serious birders.

Binoculars with notably smaller magnifications — in the 3x-5x range — can be good compact options for ultralight backcountry use or viewing concerts, theater productions, and sporting events from the nosebleeds.

Both 10×42 and 8×42 binoculars can share a 42mm objective lens. This example, however, provides two binoculars that differ in magnification. One pair has a 10x magnification while the other has an 8x magnification.

As you likely deduced, the 10x magnification binoculars are more powerful than the 8x. This allows you to view objects a bit more clearly and also hone in on more intricate details.

While the 8x magnification lens may not be as powerful, it does offer a more stable viewing experience. This means users can more easily stay focused on their subject matter and need to worry less about maintaining a steady hand.

Both 10×42 and 8×42 binoculars serve their purpose, and one isn’t necessarily better than the other. Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide which magnification will better suit your needs.

The best binoculars are the ones you’ll actually use. And oftentimes, that means going with a more compact pair. Luckily, you can get a packable pair without sacrificing too much.

The main thing with compact binoculars is light transmission. It won’t be too much of a problem during the day, but at sunrise and sunset, you may notice the quality of the image decrease.

Bottom line — if you plan to use your binoculars often or for important tasks like hunting or birdwatching, it’s worth investing more and hauling a bigger set. If your use is casual, a compact pair will work great.

One of our favorite compact binoculars, the Nikon Trailblazer 8×25 ATB Binoculars, easily fits in the palm of your hand; (photo/Kylie Mohr)

You can birdwatch with any pair of binoculars, and serious birdwatchers have multiple pairs in their arsenal. At a bare minimum, select a pair of binoculars with at least 8x magnification.

Binoculars of this caliber offer a wide enough field of view to find and follow birds without compromising the magnification needed to identify your avian subject. If you’re doing most of your bird watching from a considerable distance, try a pair of binoculars with a 10x magnification.

While slightly shakier and generally with a smaller field of view, the larger magnification allows you to focus closely on the bird at hand and observe its most intricate details. As you become more experienced, you’ll likely discover the value of having various binoculars on hand.

Is two better than one? It depends! Monoculars and binoculars both excel in different situations. Due to the singular nature of their viewing tube, monoculars can be smaller, more compact, and a good choice for users concerned about size and weight.

Monoculars can also be cheaper. But if you plan on using a device for extended periods of time (observing a bull elk or watching a hawk preen), binoculars are likely a better choice. Staring with magnification on one eye and not the other with a monocular causes eye strain if done for too long. Binoculars also have a wider field of view.

NOCS Field Tube 8×32 is a great choice when you want to keep things lightweight and compact; (photo/Nick LeFort)

There is no one right answer to this question. It all depends on how much and for what you plan on using them. But generally, binoculars aren’t cheap.

Brands like Nikon and Maven offer glassing solutions that range from $250 to $1,000. Newer brands like NOCS Provisions, whose top-of-the-line Pro Issue binoculars are $300, also offer glassing solutions.

But that’s why we make guides like this — to show you what we found out during our in-depth testing process and help you find the right binoculars for you.

" data-medium-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2020/12/BestEmergencyRadios_PCMalloryPaige.jpg" data-large-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2020/12/BestEmergencyRadios_PCMalloryPaige.jpg" />

Technology

The Best Emergency Radios of 2025

Whether you’re out of service range or out of power, these emergency radios will provide the necessary resources to keep you safe. Check out our top…

A compass is a critical piece of gear to carry on any adventure; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

" data-medium-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/12/DSC2715.jpeg" data-large-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/12/DSC2715.jpeg" />

Gadgets

The Best Compasses of 2025

We tested the best compasses from Suunto, Coghlan, Brunton, and more to help you find the best option for your needs and budget.

The Best Handheld GPS of 2025

Austin Beck-Doss — Fri, 14 Nov 2025 19:23:45 +0000

While smartphones will get the job done, they can’t match the enhanced capabilities of a dedicated GPS device. We’ve been putting the best handheld GPS to the test for close to a decade now, pulling together eight winners that’ll get you where you’re headed — no questions asked.

Knowing what you’ll use a GPS for is the first step in snagging one, and there are specialized units ideal for backpacking, hunting, and even off-roading. My top-pick Garmin GPSMAP 67i is the GPS your pops dreamed about with all the bells and whistles, while the budget-friendly Garmin eTrex SE provides simple breadcrumb tracking as a backup.

My suggestions aren’t one-offs, either. Our team has hit the dirt with these units, connecting waypoints, navigating by dead-reckoning, and tracking our trips. From wandering the hardwoods of Connecticut to connecting alpine basins across the West, our experts compared GPS tracks down to mere feet in order to separate the worthy from the weak.

Editor’s Note: We updated our Handheld GPS guide on November 14, 2025, to add the new Garmin GPSMAP H1i Plus — a do-it-all backcountry device that’ll text, send photos, and even offers voice control — as well as ratings to each device. We also updated our testing information with added details.

The Best Handheld GPS of 2025

Best Overall Handheld GPS

Garmin GPSMAP 67i

8.8/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Best Budget Handheld GPS

Garmin eTrex SE

6.5/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Best Handheld GPS for Satellite Messaging

Garmin inReach Mini 2

8.7/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Best Wrist-Mounted GPS

Garmin Foretrex 801

7.9/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

$238 at Amazon

Check Price at REI

Best Bells and Whistles GPS

Garmin GPSMAP H1i Plus

8.9/10 Rating

Jump to review

BUY OPTIONS

Check Price at REI

See more picks

8.8

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 180 hrs. in standard mode; 840 hrs. in expedition mode
Battery Type: Internal Li-ion rechargeable battery
Weight: 8.1 oz.
Memory: 16 GB with expandable memory
Screen Size: 3" diag.
Rating: IPX7, MIL-STD-810
Connectivity: USB-C, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ANT+
Sensors: GPS, Galileo, QZSS, Beidou, IRNSS / Barometer altimeter + compass
Subscription Plan: $14.99 per month for annual 'Consumer: Essential' plan

Pros

Incredible updated battery life over previous model
Large, bright, easy-to-see display
On-board messaging capabilities
Waterproof rating of IPX7
Expanded global navigation system and multiband technology

Cons

Larger overall size
Pricey if you don't need the GPS abilities

Of the models in the range, the Garmin GPSMAP 67i — at a steep $600 — is my pick for the best handheld GPS on the market. Though the 67i is built in the same case as the other GPSMAP versions, it’s packed with a plethora of superior features, making it worth every bit of that price tag.

In an update from my previous overall winner, the GPSMAP 66i, the 67i gets a jolt of added power and is now capable of up to 180 hours in standard GPS mode, and an absolutely staggering 840 hours in Expedition mode. These numbers are far beyond what the 66i was capable of, and I’ve gone multiple backpacking trips in a row without recharging the unit.

The 67i sports a 3-inch color display that presents crisp imagery, which is key for downloading satellite imagery to access off-grid. Color screens soak up a lot of juice, which is why some units, like the Garmin Montana 700i, can only run for 18 hours. The fact that the current GPSMAP can run 10x that long is a testament to good internal battery management, and we really enjoyed the experience of mapping with more detail.

That screen isn’t the only cut above the 67i makes, and while it’s now becoming commonplace in GPS tech, the multi-band capabilities (that is, multiple generations of satellites) Garmin tucked into this device put it on the bleeding edge. In my own head-to-head testing in the dense old growth of the Pacific Northwest, I found that this actually makes a difference when things get dense, with fewer dropped signals.

Other than these highlights, it’s the 67i’s fully flush back bench of features that impressed. The ‘i’ version of the GPSMAP 67 means that it’s the inReach-capable model, meaning you’ve got all of the satellite messaging capability of the inReach Mini 2 — just with a better on-device keyboard. Bluetooth capability allows you to share your waypoints with other enabled devices, and the device’s Active Weather feature is accurate and easy to use.

To be sure, this is a lot of GPS in an age where modern phones do quite a bit, but I think it’s still the best, fully-featured unit on the market today. Having a dedicated unit means you won’t be sunk if your phone dies, though if you’re really only in need of a backup, the Garmin eTrex SE is more than a quarter of the price of the 67i but still packs in some good functionality.

Those who might cycle their GPS use from hiking to offroad vehicles would likely be better served by the Garmin Montana 700i, which has a larger screen and is compatible with powered vehicle mounts. But for a ‘do-it-all’ option, I’m sticking with the GPSMAP 67i.

6.5

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery life: 168 hours in standard mode; 1,800 hours in expedition mode
Battery type: 2 AA
Weight: 5.5 oz.
Memory: 28 MB
Screen size: 2.2” diag.
Rating: IPX7
Connectivity: Bluetooth
Sensors: GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, QZSS, BeiDou

Pros

Impressive battery life
Connectivity with the Garmin Explore app
Multi-GNSS support
Digital compass
Supports real-time weather forecasting

Cons

Black and white screen
AA battery supply may not be for everyone

The Garmin eTrex SE ($150) is the modern iteration of the basic eTrex series, designed for today’s users. Besides the modernized form factor, this revamp adds a satellite receiver that keys in on five different GNSS systems, as well as the ability to seamlessly work with the Garmin Explore app. It does all that while retaining it’s offgrid chops by running on two AA batteries — no cords required here.

The form factor is familiar from the old eTrex line (which is still around for the legacy value), but the processing speed on the new unit gives the SE away. While still no modern cell phone, the SE works smoothly being piloted around by the four soft-touch buttons on the frame of the device. The screen is still basic and lo-fi black and white, which is appreciated today when looking at ultra definition screens constantly.

The eTrex 22x and 32x both only use the GPS and GLONASS positioning systems, which while still functional, won’t be as accurate as modern GPS handhelds that recieve 5+ satellite constellations. The new SE picks up GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS, giving it worldwide coverage and greater fidelity. There’s no Multi-Band reception here or Sat-IQ tech to reduce battery consumption (you’ll have to bump up to the Solar SE for Multi-Band, and the new eTrex Touch for Sat-IQ), but it’s a much wider suite of birds to source from.

Working with your phone also adds a good amount of value: Now, the SE can port over routes that you’ve traced out in the Explore app — a much nicer experience than on the device itself — and even weather forecasts (when your phone has service). The routing update is leaps ahead in technology from the 22x and 32x, and its a solid upgrade.

The internal memory is a bit foreshortened at 28 megabytes (perhaps to push some sales up the eTrex line), but it’s enough to carry around a summer full of routes and tracks. At $150, the eTrex SE is a solid budget buy.

8.7

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: Up to 336 hrs. (in 10-minute tracking mode)
Battery Type: Rechargeable internal lithium-ion
Weight: 3.5 oz.
Memory: Can save up to 1,000 waypoints
Screen Size: 0.9" diag.
Rating: IPX7
Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth, ANT+
Sensors: GPS, Galileo, QZSS + compass + Iridium

Pros

Custom messaging capability
Lightweight and compact
Two-way messaging capability
IPX7 water-resistance rating
Passive tracking mode allows others at home to track your position

Cons

Limited navigation and mapping features
Paid subscription is required for all communication features
Difficult to navigate in-device

Read Review: Garmin inReach Mini 2 Review: Up to 30-Day Battery, No-Touch Tracking

The Garmin inReach Mini 2 ($400) is an all-in-one handheld GPS device and two-way satellite messenger. Although this device deserves its place on this list of great handheld GPS devices, it’s primarily a communication device, with navigation being a secondary function. If that fits your needs, however, this is the best GPS to use for it.

With an onboard GPS/Galileo/QZSS receiver, the inReach Mini includes basic navigational features: A location screen tells you your latitude, longitude, and altitude, and has a built-in compass (all very similar to the eTrex SE or Foretrex 801). You can also drop and save waypoints along the way, and this mapping functionality is greatly heightened when used on the Garmin Explore app, where you can create your own routes and view satellite imagery.

In navigation mode, the device will point you to any waypoint or coordinates that you input. Just remember that navigation mode will always direct you along a straight line toward your destination, rather than following any existing paths or trails. A built-in compass screen also serves as a handy and basic navigational tool, and when I challenged myself to return to the trailhead using this alone, I was able to make it happen.

The Mini 2 is a backcountry communicator, first and foremost, and it’s currently one of the best. Using the global Iridium network, you get wide-reaching coverage and the ability to send messages abroad without cell service. While I think the Garmin inReach Messenger is a slightly better messenger, the Mini 2 is undoubtedly a better GPS. You can also access this service on the Garmin GPSMAP 67i, a more user-friendly device that supports direct text input.

For those seeking a device with advanced navigation and mapping features, the Mini 2 may not be the best choice. However, for $400, the inReach Mini 2 is a compact and well-built backcountry communications device that offers essential navigation features.

7.9

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 100 hrs. in standard mode; 1,000 hrs in expedition mode
Battery Type: 2 AAA (lithium, NiMH, or alkaline)
Weight: 3.8 oz.
Memory: 500 waypoints, 100 tracks, 50 navigation routes
Screen Size: 2.2”
Rating: MIL-STD-810 + IPX7
Connectivity: USB-C / Bluetooth / ANT+
Sensors: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo +Baro + Altimeter + Compass

Pros

Compact, durable, easy-to-understand interface
Minimal interaction is needed in the field to get the info you need
Battery life is impressive, and runs on AAA cells
Tough built case
Pairs with Garmin Explore app for more mapping functionality

Cons

Could be overkill for folks walking around their local dog park
The band that it comes with is all right, but there are much better options

The Garmin Foretrex 801 ($250) is a fully functional, easy-to-use, wearable GPS device that boasts MIL-STD-810 + IPX7 ratings. Though it’s got a few features that are more specific to the military, it’s ripe to be used by explorers, hunters, and wanderers — all without occupying your hands. Having it on your wrist allows you easy access to the information you need at all times.

Like many of Garmin’s other models, the Foretrex 801 offers accurate positioning, a barometric altimeter, a speedometer, and a three-axis compass. New for 801 are four operational modes that can increase your battery life from 100 to 1,000hours. Users of the previous model, the Foretrex 601, will note that this 100-hour battery life is a 52-hour upgrade on its own.

All of this is powered by 2 AAA (lithium, NiMH, or alkaline) batteries and requires only a recalibration when new batteries are installed. The ability to run good, old-fashioned AA batteries gives the 801 zero downtime in between ‘charges’ and a ubiquitous supply of juice in any corner store. Most of the eTrex series (minus the new Solar) are also powered in this way.

The 2.2-inch monochrome display is very basic, though tester Nick LeFort appreciated that it’s easy to read in sunlight while using it this summer. Of course, the benefits of a compact device also come with some compromises. Like the eTrex SE, the Foretrex 801 is not compatible with topo maps, so navigation simply involves following an on-screen vector on an otherwise bare display.

Additionally, with Bluetooth connectivity, you can pair the 801 to your smartphone to receive messages, alerts, and the like. However, it will only work while you’re within range of cell service and will affect battery life. All in all, while I think some features like the Jumpmaster and KILL SWITCH might not be for everyone, the 801’s impressive battery life, reliable features, and simple design are perfect for certain missions and activities.

8.9

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: Up to 145 hours in standard mode; 840 hours in expedition mode
Battery Type: Lithium-ion
Weight: 10.2 oz.
Memory: 64 GB
Screen Size: 3.5" diag.
Rating: IP67
Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ANT+
Sensors: Multi-Band GPS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, IRNSS

Pros

Integrates photo and voice inReach messaging ability
Bright touchscreen display
Cameras and microphone built in
Full GNSS suite with Multi-Band capabilities

Cons

Price
Large handheld size

The Garmin GPSMAP H1i Plus ($1,000) is just about the bleeding edge of modern GPS units, and nestles in the most modern inReach messaging capabilities to send everything from text to voice recordings and pictures. Add on the two(!) cameras, and this device is dang-near a backcountry phone.

At $1,000, it’s certainly got a price to go with it, but if you want to future-proof your purchase of a handheld GPS for a while, this wouldn’t be a bad choice. The H1i Plus sits beyond the 67i in the lineup, and its addition of all of the messaging abilities of the new inReach Messenger Plus (consider our review here) puts it far beyond that device. Combined with your phone, the H1i Plus is a capable backcountry messenger that can provide a lot of context with just a simple photo of trail conditions instead of describing them.

The two cameras (one on each side) go along with that photo messaging ability, and in addition to that is a microphone that you can use for voice commanding the device to do things like start your track or take a photo. It’s a handy thing to have if you’ve got the device soft-mounted somewhere like a ship’s cabin or the dash of your off-road rig.

The menus and operating system all feel familiar to Garmin, but moving around is easier with the touchscreen involved. It’s a large 3.6″ diagonal slab, so it’s not quite as large as the Garmin Montana units, but it’s still quite a large thing to hold in one hand. The price is also a bit eye-watering, and there’s also the GPSMAP H1i offered without the inReach messaging ability, which will save you $300. But if you’re after the have-it-all device, the GPSMAP H1i is it.

Other Handheld GPS Devices We Trust

7.9

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 200 hours in standard mode; up to 1,800 hours in expedition mode; unlimited with solar
Battery Type: Internal rechargeable lithium ion
Weight: 5 oz.
Memory: 28 MB
Screen Size: 2.2”
Rating: IPX7
Connectivity: USB-C / Bluetooth
Sensors: Multi-band GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, Beidou, IRNSS + Compass

Pros

Solar cells in screen powers device indefinitely in direct sunlight
Multi-band GPS reception
Modern USB-C charging
Affordable pricing
Simple feature set executed well

Cons

Notifications don’t go away on their own
Black and white screen isn't the nicest to use

The Garmin eTrex Solar ($250) was designed for whatever adventures you have in mind — without having to worry about running out of battery power. It also sports multi-band GPS and USB-C charging, making this a current-era GPS unit that goes heavy on doing a few functions very well.

The eTrex Solar is the quick update to Garmin’s other nouveau eTrex unit, the eTrex SE, which leaned into the new wave of app-connected devices to greatly update their utility to modern outdoors folks. In both units, you get fairly simple 2D route tracking and route-finding, enhanced geocaching functions, the now-standard suite of 5 satellite systems, and the ability to create maps in the Garmin Explore app to port over to the GPS.

The Solar version, obviously, adds the sun to the mix and boasts unlimited battery life due to its efficient solar panel built into the front of the unit. The eTrex Solar also has multi-band GPS — typically only seen in high-end units like the Garmin GPSMAP 67i — which allows for some serious pinpoint accuracy. How accurate? In testing, I was accurate within 6 feet. What’s more, having access to more satellites means a lower risk for interference.

What enables the eTrex Solar to have such a minimal operating system without sacrificing functionality is the ability to pair the unit with your smartphone. This gives you instant access to real-time weather, but when you use it in conjunction with Garmin’s Explore app, you soon find that you’ve got everything you need to have fun navigating for years to come.

I think the eTrex Solar is a better all-around device than the previous 22x and 32x versions (though those devices are still sold), but there is a compelling reason to stick with them: color screens. The Solar version sips battery life by going with that monochrome screen, and if digging into a topo map is essential for you, it can make good sense to stick with the classics.

Aimed at the outdoor enthusiast looking for on-demand information, I found that the eTrex Solar was geared toward anyone looking for an easy-to-use, affordable handheld GPS unit. Whatever adventures you have in mind, with the eTrex Solar, you’ll never have to worry about connectivity, accuracy, or battery life.

6.8

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 25 hrs.
Battery Type: 2 AA
Weight: 5 oz.
Memory: 8 GB
Screen Size: 2.2" diag.
Rating: IPX7
Connectivity: Mini-USB
Sensors: GPS, GLONASS

Pros

Budget price
Simple, easy-to-use interface
Lightweight and compact
Easy to mark and save waypoints

Cons

Only two GNSS receivers
Lacks barometric altimeter and three-axis compass
Interface feels antiquated
Mini-USB charging, not USB-C

The compact Garmin eTrex 22x ($180) is the very definition of a handheld GPS — and one that has been offered for some time. For considerably less money than most options on the market, this is a highly capable device. The 22x is perfect for users who prioritize simplicity over high-end features.

The eTrex 22x excels in its basic tracking and waypoint-marking capabilities. Thanks to its compact size, this device takes up very little space in your pack, making it a good selection for expeditions or adventures where weight is a factor. The rugged outer case and 2.2″ display won’t fail when exposed to rain, splashes, and snow.

For a baseline unit, the 22x provides solid GPS/GLONASS reception, though this is one of the most limited ranges of global satellite networks I’ve tested (tied with the Garmin eTrex 32x and, surprisingly, the Montana 700i). Compared side-by-side with the GPSMAP 67i when testing accuracy, the 22x was about 5 feet off in its given location. It is certainly close enough for daily use, but also not perfect.

Instead of a touchscreen, the eTrex 22x has buttons and a single toggle for navigating around the screen. Even while wearing gloves, this device is relatively easy to operate. The user interface is noticeably dated compared to a modern unit like the GPSMAP or Montana series, but it still gets the job done.

To the best of my knowledge, Garmin still offers the eTrex 22x as a bit of a legacy buy. It’s a device that is still danged good at the GPS in the traditional sense, and has an operating system that is simple to use and understand. I still think that the new eTrex Solar (or eTrex SE if you don’t need remote charging) is the better budget buy, but for those who pine for the classics, the 22x makes a lot of sense.

7.3

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 18 hrs.
Battery Type: Rechargeable lithium-ion battery
Weight: 1 lb., 7.3 oz.
Memory: 16 GB and compatible with micro-SD cards
Screen Size: 5" diag.
Rating: IPX7, MIL-STD-810
Connectivity: Micro-USB, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ANT+
Sensors: GPS, Galileo + barometer altimeter + compass

Pros

Huge, high-resolution display
Integrated satellite messaging and SOS capability
Rugged construction with Gorilla Glass screen
Lots of internal memory
Can be run on a powered vehicle mount

Cons

Only two GNSS receivers
Shorter battery life
Heavy and bulky
Expensive

The Garmin Montana 700i ($700) boasts a rugged and durable design, a large touchscreen, and navigation capabilities that make it an ideal companion for off-roaders and overlanders. Best run on a powered vehicle mount, the 700i is best thought of as a GPSMAP 67i that trades satellite accuracy for enhanced visuals and usability.

The 700i’s high-resolution 5-inch display looks like it belongs on a high-end smartphone. An updated Gorilla Glass screen ensures that the massive display is hardy and not too fragile for the backcountry. Multiple preloaded TopoActive maps enable you to view various terrain features on your screen, including peaks, lakes, major roads, and trails.

I was surprised to learn that the 700i only uses the GPS and Galileo satellite networks to inform its navigation tech. While these are augmented by the barometer and compass sensors, I found that the fidelity difference between a unit like this and a modern, 5 GNSS + multi-band device is noticeable. Comparing tracks between the two shows that better-equipped devices are tighter to our trail.

That said, considering the vehicle-mounted application I think the 700i excels at best, you may not actually need that pinpoint accuracy (a forest road is often 10′ wide — outside the deviation I saw). Because of its vast connectivity capabilities and its huge, brightly lit display, the 700i has a shorter battery life than other, more simplistic devices on this list. Also, it weighs a hefty 1 pound 7.3 ounces.

However, those issues are also resolved by mounting the 700i on a Garmin AMPS mount, which keeps the unit powered while the vehicle is running. Compared to the 700 version, the 700i includes satellite messaging and the ability to send out SOS signals in case of emergency. Instead of carrying a separate device like the inReach Mini 2 for communication, the 700i includes this feature in its already long list of functions.

Though the Montana 700i wouldn’t be described as svelte or lightweight, it’s most certainly among the best options for those after an in-vehicle, out-of-vehicle GPS.

6.2

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 2 AA batteries last up to 25 hrs. before needing replacement
Battery Type: 2 AA
Weight: 5 oz.
Memory: 8 GB, micro-SD card compatible
Screen Size: 2.2" diag.
Rating: IPX7
Connectivity: Mini-USB, ANT+
Sensors: GPS, GLONASS + barometric altimeter + compass

Pros

Clear and bright color display
Built-in compass and barometric altimeter
Easy-to-press large buttons
Reliable AA batteries are easy to get

Cons

User interface takes some practice to learn
Battery life isn't the longest

The Garmin eTrex 32x ($300) is another solid handheld GPS navigator. With a water-resistant outer coating and a 2.2-inch color display, the eTrex 32x is similar in appearance to the eTrex 22x. The difference is that the 32x comes with a barometric altimeter and a three-axis compass.

That added functionality comes into play in a few key areas: for one, a barometric altimeter is essential in alpine climbing, where choosing the correct route can be the difference of a few hundred vertical feet. The three-axis compass is tilt-compensated, meaning you don’t need to level the device to obtain an accurate reading. This is also handy in the vertical realm.

It should be noted that the eTrex series from Garmin has been in the line-up for a good long time, and while the functionality is undeniable, we’d quite like to see a processor update come to these little machines. Both the 22x and the eTrex 32x take a little longer than most people are used to waiting for a gadget to complete a computing task.

Like the eTrex 22x, I still believe that the new eTrex Solar is a better option if you’re considering mid-tier GPS options. You get a modern user interface, improved satellite receivers, and a significant addition of functionality due to being app-compatible. Still, though, like the 22x, I think there’s a place for the 32x. This device is simple to use and appears to be reliable.

6.0

Being able to get out a message nearly anywhere makes satellite messengers essential for deep expeditions; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Rating Details

Specifications

Battery Life: 24 hrs.
Battery Type: 800 mAh internal
Weight: 1.9 oz.
Memory: Unpublished
Screen Size: 2.2" diag.
Rating: IPX7
Connectivity: Micro-USB, Bluetooth
Sensors: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo + Barometer + Temperature

Pros

Easy setup
Compass, temperature, time, barometric pressure, and elevation displays
Durable rubber exo skeleton
Waterproof to IPX7
Light weight at less than 2 ounces

Cons

No built-in maps
Very tiny, could get easily misplaced

The Bushnell BackTrack Mini GPS ($105) is ideal for individuals new to GPS use and/or those who do not require or want the advanced features of more expensive options reviewed elsewhere. This is breadcrumb tracking done well — without the added features that typically drive up prices.

Just four buttons manage the various screens on this device, with the main function of this GPS being “backtracking” to return you to your starting point. The display shows your path as a series of breadcrumbs, allowing you to drop waypoints along the way. There are no trails or detailed maps on this device — simply your track back and forth.

While testing the BackTrack in rural Alaska, tester Justin La Vigne trekked out to a high alpine lake through wind-driven snow, which quickly obscured his tracks. The backtracking functionality worked a treat in this situation, as it provides a clear picture of directionality. Don’t expect anything more than a 2D representation, however, which means you’ll need to use some imagination to navigate.

I like to think of the BackTrack Mini as a compass for the new age — a device that provides the essentials when it comes to navigation but isn’t bogged down with extraneous features that get little actual use. The display is simple and uncrowded, and there’s something I respect about a little device that does exactly what it was made to do.

Switch screens to view other options, such as elevation gain/decrease, barometric pressure, temperature, time, sunrise/sunset times, and a full-screen compass. One cool feature is that the device tells you the best days and times to hunt and fish based on moon phases. You can also connect the BackTrack Mini to your smartphone via the Bushnell Connect app and upload, edit, and share your trips with friends.

If you need something with a bit more mapping capability, the Garmin eTrex SE is only $45 more and offers route tracking and waypoint logging, as well as a suite of GNSS reception, which makes the device feel far more modern than the Bushnell.

Handheld GPS Comparison Chart

Handheld GPS	Price	Battery Life (Standard Mode)	Weight	Sensors	Rating
Garmin GPSMAP 67i	$600	180 hrs.	8.1 oz.	GPS, Galileo, QZSS, Beidou, IRNSS + barometric altimeter + compass	IPX7, MIL-STD-810
Garmin eTrex SE	$150	168 hours	5.5 oz.	GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, QZSS, BeiDou	IPX7
Garmin inReach Mini 2	$400	Up to 336 hrs.	3.5 oz.	GPS, Galileo, QZSS + compass + Iridium	IPX7
Garmin Foretrex 801	$250	100 hrs.	3.1 oz.	GPS, GLONASS, Galileo + barometric altimeter + compass	IPX7, MIL-STD-810
Garmin GPSMAP H1i Plus	$1,000	145 hrs.	10.2 oz.	Multi-Band GPS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, IRNSS	IP67
Garmin eTrex Solar	$250	200 hrs.	5 oz.	GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, Beidou, IRNSS + compass	IPX7
Garmin eTrex 22x	$180	25 hrs.	5 oz.	GPS, GLONASS	IPX7
Garmin Montana 700i	$700	18 hrs.	1 lb., 7.3 oz.	GPS, Galileo + barometric altimeter + compass	IPX7, MIL-STD-810
Garmin eTrex 32x	$300	25 hrs.	5 oz.	GPS, GLONASS + barometric altimeter + compass	IPX7
Bushnell BackTrack Mini GPS	$105	24 hrs.	1.9 oz.	GPS, GLONASS, Galileo + barometer + temperature	IPX7

Big and small — there’s a GPS device that’ll fit any trip you’ve got planned; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

How We Tested the Best Handheld GPS

The GearJunkie team includes hikers, cyclists, hunters, anglers, expeditionary explorers, and more. GPS devices are essential tools for many of the activities we love. Over the years, we have tested many handheld GPS units, and this list comprises the best of the best. If you’re looking for a more wrist-mounted solution, check out our GPS fitness watches guide. If you need a device to send messages while exploring, a satellite messenger is likely up your alley.

Field testing: We primarily rank these GPS units based on our experiences in the field with them. We use them to navigate off trail in the North Cascades, track off-road journeys in the Northeast, and plot our routes to remote cabins in Alaska before giving them the thumbs up or down.
Tracking accuracy comparison: We assemble on a 400-meter track and track loops simultaneously with multiple GPS devices, then compare their results. The deviation from our known lane can be seen side by side, and we also do this when taking coordinates from a known location. Besides this, we also compare the time to position lock between each GPS, and ground-truth how accurate digital compasses are by comparing them to the real thing.
Battery run time tracking: We also test these devices based on their given battery run times and compare them against our own findings when rendering our rankings. Each is run down a number of times and then averaged across the use for better detail.
Our handheld GPS rating system:
- Satellite Reception: 30% weighted. Does the GPS use multiple GNSS systems? Does it provide a location lock quickly? Does it perform well in deep canyons or cities?
- Feature Set: 30% weighted. Can you plot routes directly on the device? Is there a barometer to compare the GPS altitude against? Does it link to a phone-based app for additional functionality?
- Battery Life: 20% weighted. Our battery run times inform this ranking, and we look for both a solid battery life in the basic settings (limited GNSS reception), as well as with all sensors turned on.
- Durability: 20% weighted. Does the device look worn after a season of use? Is the screen scratched? Do the buttons still work as they should? Does the GPS have an IP rating?

Our Expert Testers

Our testing team is certainly up to the task. Austin Beck-Doss dove headlong into the wilderness of Wyoming to test the majority of these GPS devices — and made it back out to report his findings. To say he’s proficient in these gadgets is an understatement.

The same can be said of Berne Broudy, who we’re certain hasn’t been in cell range for years. She’s not only an expert in the field, but she also relies on GPS units in her day-to-day life. Who better to identify the pros and cons of these complex units than someone who really needs them?

Finally, our most recent testing comes from contributor Nick LeFort, who knew little about the Garmin Foretrex 801 and eTrex Solar when we tasked him with testing them out. So, he spent a month getting lost — on foot and in his truck — all over New England to see what GPS was all about. Now, he won’t stop talking about the positive impact these GPS units can have on you — to the point where he believes they’re an asset.

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose a Handheld GPS Device

The compact Garmin inReach Mini 2 is more often touted as a sat messenger, but when paired with a phone it makes an admirable GPS unit; (photo/Berne Broudy)

Although handheld GPS devices have been available for several decades, recent developments have significantly enhanced the capabilities of the options available on the market in 2025.

Some of the devices on this list focus strictly on providing quality GPS mapping and position tracking. Other options also offer a long list of additional features such as Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity, touchscreen displays, satellite messaging, emergency features, altimeters, compasses, and more.

With numerous available features and a wide range of high-quality options, it can be challenging to navigate the market and determine which handheld GPS best suits your needs. Remember, the ideal device is the one that will add the most benefit to your life and your navigational pursuits.

Before you purchase, consider your needs. It may even be helpful to make a list of features that are non-negotiable for you. Determining your budget before you begin shopping may also be helpful, as devices on the market vary widely in price, ranging from $100 to over $900.

We recommend every device on this list. Through careful research and product testing, we have compiled a list of well-made, high-quality handheld GPS devices. Our guide aims to explain various features and terminology that you’re likely to encounter when shopping for a handheld GPS.

Handheld GPS User Profiles

The multi-band capabilities of the Garmin GPSMAP 67i allow it to access not only multiple different satellite systems, but also different generations of those satellites, providing a very high fidelity for location; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

The Backpacker & Hiker: Camp should be right over the next pass — right? Bringing along a GPS for hiking or backpacking can aid in keeping you on trail, or in getting you back to it after some bushwhacking or scrambling. Choosing a device with extended battery life is key here, as well as one that has the on-device mapping abilities to aid in on-the-ground navigation.

The thru-hikers among us rave about the compact abilities of the inReach Mini 2 from Garmin, which is low-profile enough to toss into nearly any pack. On-device navigation here is quite limited but improves greatly when used with the Garmin Explore app. And if you’re looking for a do-it-all hiking device, the Garmin GPSMAP 67i has onboard topos and downloadable satellite imagery.

The Hunter: Everyone has got that secret spot, you’ve just got to be able to find your way back to it. Hunting with a handheld GPS ensures that navigation is secondary to the real reason you’re out here, and quick accessibility will keep you from messing around

If your hunting consists of tromping out to the blind or tree stand, a simple unit like the Bushnell BackTrack is a low barrier of entry way to get you there and back without a hiccup. Tracking your quarry? Going wrist-mounted like the Garmin Foretrex 801 will keep your hands free should a can’t-miss opportunity present itself.

Geocaching can be a hoot, but you’ll need a GPS to get there; (photo/Nick LeFort)

The Geocacher: If you’ve never stumbled across a hidden treasure out in the woods, it’s high time you give it a shot. Geocaching is a global phenomenon, with small containers known as caches hidden, and GPS waypoints given to those looking to find them. Geocaches are typically hidden quite well, so having the highest fidelity GPS unit you can get your hands on will help pinpoint the booty.

Leaning on a unit with Multi-Band GNSS technology, like the Garmin GPSMAP 67i, will aid the satellite receiver in seeking out signal in historically difficult areas, such as beneath tree cover or inside canyons. And certain units, like the eTrex Solar, are designed specifically with geocaching in mind, and host a “Live Geocaching” functionality that downloads cache coordinates and descriptions directly to your device.

The Overlander: Your rig can go just about anywhere, granted you know where it is you’re going. Going with a GPS with good mounting options will keep it close at hand, and having routable topographic maps will key in on trails and roads to plot a route to where you’re trying to get to.

For all of our overlanding, we reach for the Garmin Montana 700i, which has a broad touchscreen for easy nav while bouncing around. This unit also can be rigged up with a powered AMPS Rugged Mou nt that keeps your GPS going by keeping it on the cord. If you’re in a smaller rig like a side-by-side UTV, the inReach Mini 2 from Garmin can also be mounted using an adapter, and makes for a quick connection to your phone for messaging other drivers.

The right tool for the job can make all the difference; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Reception

The positional accuracy of handheld GPS devices has improved steadily over the decades. Now, high-quality devices such as the ones on this list can pinpoint the user’s location within a margin of 10 meters or less.

According to Garmin, the manufacturer of multiple devices on our list, units that are equipped with the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) can be accurate to 3 meters or less. Most GPS units are limited to the L1 frequency of GPS. With plans to have a majority, if not all, of our satellites running on the L5 frequency, units like the Garmin eTrex Solar and Garmin GPSMAP 67i, which can access both bands simultaneously, are ready for the future.

Global Navigation Satellite Systems

Keying in on different satellite systems will provide a higher fidelity GPS location; (photo/Nick LeFort)

While GPS (Global Positioning System) has become synonymous with satellite navigation devices, this is only one orbiting satellite system in a constellation of systems that are known as GNSS, or Global Navigation Satellite Systems.

With more than 30 satellites in operation today, the United States Global Positioning System is easily the world’s most utilized system based on the amount of people in the United States who use products with GPS technology. It is joined by the Russian GLONASS (24), Chinese BeiDou (35), the European Union’s Galileo (30), and the regional Japanese system QZSS/Michibiki (4). In general, the more GNSS systems that a GPS device is capable of receiving, the greater the location fidelity. This is often denoted as ‘Multi-GNSS Capable’.

In recent years, GPS devices have begun to incorporate chipsets that take advantage of the different generations of satellites within individual satellite systems. These systems are constantly being updated, and new satellites are launched annually, so there are several different sets of satellites that a GPS can key in on. By broadening data collection, new GPS devices can eke out even more satnav horsepower.

As this type of technology becomes more widespread and adopted, you’ll see fewer and fewer people reaching to the sky in an attempt to find a connection. In landscapes both urban and undeveloped, large features such as canyons and skyscrapers can degrade your signal and decrease the accuracy of your GPS device. But the chances of you holding on to a signal are a lot better than they were even just a few years ago.

App Integrations

Syncing your GPS with your phone can boost its usability and functionality in the backcountry, giving you a broader interface to work with; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

This is where things get interesting. When out in the field, you’re relying on your GPS. But when you get back home or even to camp, you can download an app to upload your tracks, waypoints, and everything the GPS recorded during your trip.

Most GPS units can pair with your smartphone and even have the capability to connect via Bluetooth. This is especially beneficial with smaller units like the Garmin inReach Mini 2, where you can connect to your phone and use the bigger buttons on your phone to communicate two ways.

Garmin has put a considerable amount of effort into its Explore App (Apple, Android). When paired to your smartphone, it allows you to enter your waypoints, plan your routes, and stay connected by being able to receive text, incoming calls, and other notifications that you have set up on your phone already.

We often rely on this option during downtime in a tent when there’s blustery weather — much better to type on a phone instead of on a small screen.

The Garmin Explore app can be accessed both on your phone and a desktop; (image/Garmin Explore)

Satellite Navigation on Your Smartphone

As smartphones improve year over year, many backcountry users have taken to utilizing navigation apps such as Gaia GPS, CalTopo, or Avenza Maps to find their way. The benefit is that your phone often has a stout processor and expanded memory, which can make in-device navigation a much more enjoyable experience.

While many smartphones incorporate a rudimentary GPS chip for location finding, this is often augmented with cellphone tower pings to better triangulate your location. When you leave the coverage of cell towers, you lose this ability and with it, some accuracy. For those who don’t require pinpoint navigation, this level of information can often be adequate. But in many circumstances, having the additional data that a full GNSS receiver provides can keep you on track when it matters.

Ease of Use

Generally, the larger the device, the easier it’ll be to operate; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Every handheld GPS device has a unique user interface you’ll have to learn as the device’s operator. Some devices, like the Garmin eTrex Solar, are operated using a small number of simple buttons, while others, like the Garmin GPSMAP H1i Plus or Montana 700i, rely on a large color touchscreen display.

No matter the configuration of your device, we recommend spending some time reading the user manual and practicing navigating with your device before you head out into the backcountry.

Additionally, Garmin has a whole video Learning Center that is dedicated to getting you dialed into your new GPS device without having to read a complete manual. These videos focus on the things you need to get you up and running.

Displays and Buttons

The tactile buttons on the Foretrex 801 add to the redundancy factor — no glitching touch screens here; (photo/Nick LeFort)

Large touchscreens tend to offer a shorter learning curve thanks to their large, bright, and colorful displays. These kinds of devices are quick to learn for people familiar with smartphone use, but they also come with some downsides.

Most notably, touchscreen handheld GPS devices are difficult to use when the weather is cold or wet. While out hunting, fishing, or hiking, it’s likely that you’ll be wearing gloves. Simply put, you can’t operate a touchscreen without touchscreen gloves, which renders high-end devices like the Garmin Montana 700i warm-weather-specific.

For a super easy-to-use handheld GPS that utilizes buttons instead of a touchscreen, we recommend the simple and affordable Garmin eTrex Solar.

To deal with the issue of glare and sunny-day readability, Garmin’s new models have been engineered with antiglare screens that make maps and data easy to decipher — even in the direct sun.

In-Device Navigation

You won’t get much in the way of a map with the inReach Mini 2, but for dead-reckoning to a bearing, it’s a simple device to use; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Out of the box, most GPS devices come with a very simplistic map that displays little detail about the terrain. Some high-end devices come with multiple maps preloaded, each displaying certain information and landmarks such as roads, trails, and lakes.

Many devices allow you to purchase additional maps and upload them to the device. Some sources, such as the United States Geological Survey (USGS), offer free spatial data that can be added to your device.

Generally, the more data and information about the terrain that your device contains, the easier it will be to navigate using the mapping function of the device.

Satellite imagery, which is essentially a compilation of aerial photos of Earth stitched together, is often difficult to view and utilize on a handheld GPS device. However, some devices with larger displays like the Garmin Montana 700i are more capable of making use of satellite imagery during navigation.

Most makers of handheld GPS devices have created their own software that’s used to organize and display the tracks and waypoints that you have saved using your device.

BaseCamp from Garmin is an excellent platform that provides everything you need as a GPS user. For example, using BaseCamp, you can overlay your waypoints and tracks onto Google Earth. This is especially helpful for devices unable to utilize satellite imagery on their own.

Battery Life

The integrated rechargeable battery of the Garmin GPSMAP 67i gives it a long life in the field, as well as the ability to recharge on the go; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Many handheld GPS devices still rely on AA batteries, which are cheap, quick to replace, and easily accessible. However, if you’re heading out on a long expedition where access to a store is out of the question, you’ll have to bring a potentially annoying quantity of fresh batteries to keep your device working. While AA batteries remain an option, some manufacturers are now making devices with rechargeable battery packs — and even solar — as a practical alternative.

Rechargeable batteries can reduce weight and save money over time. Many outdoor professionals and recreationists carry battery packs or solar panels, which are compact ways of recharging a handheld GPS in the field. Many models have rechargeable batteries that are also compatible with AA batteries as a backup. A unit like the Garmin eTrex Solar allows you to leave the solar panels at home; relying on a rechargeable Lithium battery and a built-in solar reception.

Depending on the length of the trips you’ll be taking with your device, aim for a handheld GPS that has a long battery life while in active GPS-enabled modes. Typically, one of the trade-offs of large touchscreen devices is that they tend to have a shorter battery life than button-operated alternatives.

The Garmin Foretrex 801 boasts a battery life on two AAA batteries of up to 1,000 hours. It’s hard to fathom that number for anything battery-powered, but it’s doable if you create a routine. This particular unit offers different modes that may require less energy to maintain. None of these units is a set-it-and-forget-it device. They all take a little time to get used to, but once you do, you’ll find yourself creating routines that keep you informed and powered.

Weight

Devices like the Bushnell BackTrack Mini easily slip into a pocket when not in use. Just don’t lose them in the snow; (photo/Justin La Vigne)

Depending on where you’re going with your GPS and how you plan to get there, weight may be an important consideration. Some handheld GPS devices, like the Garmin inReach Mini 2 and Bushnell BackTrack Mini GPS weigh under 4 ounces. Others, like the Garmin Montana 700i, weigh over a pound.

Oftentimes, smaller devices will need to leave some features out in order to hit the profile they’re aiming at. When we are considering a GPS, we often weigh the ability of the GPS on its own, as well as consider if our phone will be needed to take full advantage of all of its features. A small GPS plus phone combo can be a powerful team, but many may instead opt for an all-in-one device, like the Garmin GPSMAP 67i.

Memory

Most information saved to handheld GPS devices comes in the form of routes or coordinates for a specific location you want to save for future use. For most trips, only a few waypoints are necessary.

Devices on this list are capable of saving between 500 and 10,000 waypoints at any given time, which should be more than enough — especially if you plan to clear this data or move it to another device between trips.

However, if you plan to save waypoints from multiple trips all at once, or if you want to be able to store lots of maps and satellite images on your device, look for options with plenty of storage space. High-end models often hold up to 16 GB of information, and many are also compatible with micro-SD memory cards for additional storage capacity.

Mapping

The mapping functionality of the GPSMAP series is dense, with most models coming preloaded with Garmin’s TopoActive maps; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Every handheld GPS comes with a basic map, which is essentially a blank screen that includes the most noteworthy local features and nothing more. Many modern Garmin products come with a preloaded base map with contour lines that convey elevation, points of interest, and major trails and roads.

On most devices, maps can be added to enhance the default base-level map, creating a more detailed layout of the terrain around you. Remember, additional maps consume memory, so ensure your device isn’t full if you want to add more maps.

Some simple devices, like the Garmin Foretrex 801, are unable to accept new maps. Others, like the Garmin Montana models, can be thoroughly customized. The fewer map features on a GPS unit may mean more time pre-planning your next adventure. But the more features might create bloat that you don’t need. It’s important to find balance.

Satellite Messaging and Emergency Features

The satellite messaging functionality of the Garmin inReach Mini 2 really is the star of the show, but it does an admirable job with navigation as well; (photo/Nick Belcaster)

Satellite messaging devices have the ability to send (and sometimes receive) messages in areas where cellular devices don’t have reception. Now, many handheld GPS devices have been built with this capability to create a class of all-in-one backcountry navigation and communication tools.

To use these messaging features, a paid subscription is usually required, which allows a limited number of messages to be sent and received each month.

For those who wish to communicate with others while out of cellphone range, this is an invaluable feature that can quell worry from afar and keep everyone in the loop. Some satellite messaging devices can be programmed to automatically send out predetermined messages at regular time intervals.

In the event of an emergency, you must be able to quickly signal for help. Some devices have an SOS button that can instantly trigger a response from local emergency medical services. On this list, the Garmin inReach Mini 2 has more communication features than navigation features, but it’s a great little device.

Geocaching

(Photo/Nick LeFort)

Geocaching is an increasingly popular outdoor activity that utilizes navigational tools to search for cool treasures that have been hidden all over the world. Most GPS units are suitable for assisting enthusiasts in this hobby, and some are even designed specifically for geocaching adventures.

The Garmin eTrex Solar is a simple and excellent personal GPS tracker that serves as an affordable entry point into the exciting world of geocaching. It receives automatic cache updates from Geocaching Live, and allows you to upload your successful finds directly to your Geocaching profile from within the device.

Barometric Altimeter

Most handheld GPS devices include a barometric altimeter. When navigating, it’s often highly important to be aware of your current altitude with an accurate barometer. Using pressure sensors, an altimeter can also help you track weather patterns and trends, which is important information to have — especially in the mountains.

Compass

A three-axis compass, which is included in most midlevel (and up) handheld GPS models, allows you to read direction no matter how you’re holding the device. It’s a handy feature, though it’s not strictly necessary because it’s a good idea to carry a standard compass as a backup anyway.

What About GPS Watches?

Flagship GPS watches, like the Garmin Fenix 7 Pro, boast fast processors that make wrist-mounted GPS nav possible; (photo/Matthew Tangeman)

In recent years, GPS watches have become smaller, faster, and more powerful than ever — now rivaling many of the functionalities of handheld GPS units. The same satellite navigation chipsets are used across both styles of devices. While a dedicated device will almost always be quicker, a GPS watch can have impressive tracking capabilities, especially if it is multi-GNSS capable.

While those who are drawn to the more all-in-one GPS offerings — like the Garmin GPSMAP 67i or Montana 700i — likely won’t consider a GPS watch as a viable alternative, those who are looking into a smaller device that relies on a phone for expanded navigation capabilities may find them to be a possible alternative.

If you land in this camp, consider that a GPS watch will often have a shorter battery life compared to a small GPS unit. Additionally, their antennas are significantly smaller than those of a purpose-built device. This can result in a longer wait time when seeking a location lock.

Price & Value

GPS devices can run a range of prices from around $100 for simple trackers to $700+ for full-featured touchscreen tablets. Consider what you’ll be using your GPS for most when deciding which to pick up — long-distance backpackers may want to invest a bit more compared to once-in-a-while hikers.

Budget

GPS units have been around for a while now, meaning there are cheaper legacy products that still provide a great experience, as well as modern options meant to provide just what you’re after. Breadcrumb tracking is the norm here, where the unit will take a location at set intervals, and you can use this later to return to your start.

Budget GPS units typically will only receive a few satellite services, GPS, and either GLONASS or Galileo. The Bushnell BackTrack Mini GPS (
$105) tacks on another as well as a barometer, making this an outsized value unit that we suggest for simple backtracking. The Garmin eTrex 22x ($180) is a bit of an old-school device at this point but provides reliable navigation and a color screen.

The $250 Garmin eTrex Solar is a middle of the road price, but does a lot for it; (photo/Nick LeFort)

Mid-Tier

Jumping up to paying between $200 and $400 can get you a lot more in tech, including the full suite of 5 standard satellite services (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, and BeiDou), a battery life of 100+ hours, and a modern user interface with app integration. This last feature is one of the most notable, and creating routes on the fly and then porting them over to the Garmin eTrex Solar ($250) works flawlessly.

This price range also opens up some specialization, like the wrist-mounted and tactical Garmin Foretrex 801 ($250) and the satellite messenger/GPS inReach Mini 2 ($400). The Garmin eTrex 32x ($300) is a bit of an outlier at its price but provides a clean user experience and good-enough accuracy.

Premium

If you’re paying $700+ for a GPS device, it’s got all the bells and whistles: Satellite messaging capability, bright touchscreen, and adaptability to a larger ecosystem of mounts. These devices are sometimes best mounted in a vehicle, like the Garmin Montana 700i, which works excellently on an ATV or side-by-side.

The $600 Garmin GPSMAP 67i is our choice of the best GPS available today, and it’s got pretty much everything you could need on it. Remember that using an inReach capable device will also require a subscription to the service — another fee to consider when going with a premium unit.

Frequently Asked Questions

All of the handheld GPS devices on this list are high quality. We recommend each one for different reasons. Of these options, determining which one is best is all about figuring out what your needs are and which device best suits them.

If you’re looking for a device that has a large color screen but is also compact and lightweight, the Garmin GPSMAP 67i is an excellent choice. If you’re looking for a packable device that can reliably communicate via satellite, the Garmin inReach Mini 2 would be a great buy.

With a clear signal, many modern handheld GPS devices can pinpoint your location with a margin of error of just a few meters. This level of accuracy is great for emergency scenarios, reliable waypoint setting, and geocaching. Integrated altimeters and three-axis compasses in handheld GPS devices are also more accurate now than ever before.

Keep in mind, however, having a compass or map in your pack is still recommended, as they are a sure thing that doesn’t rely on a battery or satellite to get you out of a jam.

For accurate navigation in regions where cellular service isn’t available, handheld GPS devices are certainly better than smartphones for reliable mapping and positioning. Purpose-built GPS devices also tend to hold up much better to the elements than smartphones.

Though smartphones can be helpful navigational tools, their short battery life, reliance on cellular service, and general fragility mean they just aren’t the best option for proper expeditionary navigation.

Additionally, their GPS accuracy is within 5 meters — or roughly 16 feet. Though this number continues to improve as smartphones get upgraded to newer models, the fact remains that GPS units like the one in this guide are too. With dedicated GPS handhelds already ahead of smartphones in terms of accuracy and reliability, we have no reason to believe that’s going to change.

While some geocaching locations can be navigated with a smartphone, a handheld GPS device like the Garmin eTrex Solar is really the best tool for geocaching. With a handheld GPS, you can enjoy geocaching sessions without cellular service and save waypoints so you can return to specific locations over and over again.

Geocaching, arguably the largest and most popular geocaching database on the planet, can pair with most handheld GPS units. It’s also available as an app for smartphones, but once you pair your handheld GPS with their desktop site, you may never need to use the app again.

" data-medium-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/04/DSC7275.jpg" data-large-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2023/04/DSC7275.jpg" />

Technology

The Best Satellite Messengers of 2025

Failure isn’t an option when it comes to choosing a satellite messenger. When you absolutely need to get the word out, here are the best…

Top fitness watch brands include Garmin, COROS, Suunto, Polar, and Fitbit; (photo/Matthew Tangeman)

" data-medium-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2024/03/DSC_3776.jpg" data-large-file="https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.gearjunkie.com/uploads/2024/03/DSC_3776.jpg" />

Fitness

The Best Fitness Watches of 2025

We tested the best fitness watches of 2025 with options for every budget. Our top picks include Garmin, COROS, and more!

Emergency Medical Device Chip Info Without Cell Service, Batteries, or Subscription

Mary Andino — Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:55:02 +0000

Skiers, cyclists, climbers, and backpackers often carry satellite communication devices. But those useful emergency devices are still only one piece of the puzzle when it comes to staying safe in the backcountry. If you send out an SOS message and first responders reach you, they’ll need to know your medical history, allergies, and prescriptions.

That’s where the new KOPILOT.ID ($40) could come in handy. It’s a digital medical ID that stores all of your necessary personal medical info in a compact, secure, and battery-free package. There’s no subscription fee, and the mobile app you use to upload your info is free and secure.

All someone has to do in an emergency is tap a phone to your KOPILOT.ID and all of your relevant information will display.

KOPILOT.ID recently partnered with the Breck Epic mountain bike race as the event’s official safety sponsor. In 2026, every competitor will get one of these devices and will be required to wear it.

“When risk, unpredictability, and flow collide, seconds matter. KOPILOT.ID helps make sure the information that matters most is right there when you need it,” Mark Roebke, co-founder of KOPILOT.ID, said.

How the KOPILOT.ID Works

(Photo/KOPILOT.ID)

Setting up the device is simple. It pairs with the free KOPILOT.ID smartphone app. In the app, you’ll list all pertinent info, including emergency contacts, allergies, medical conditions and history, and medications.

The KOPILOT.ID is about the size of a thumbnail. It works through NFC, or near-field communication. Similar to the tap-to-pay function on credit cards, NFC exchanges information with a device using short-range wireless technology.

If the worst-case scenario occurs and you’re unresponsive in an emergency situation, first responders can tap any smartphone to the KIPILOT.ID and access all the necessary information to provide appropriate care. While you need the app to create your medical profile, people don’t need the app to access its info.

This technology is similar to smartphone emergency medical identification (SEMID) applications, like the iPhone’s Medical ID function. A study done by the University of Rochester on the usefulness of SEMID apps found that the information stored in them was useful and relevant to patient care in 75% of cases reviewed.

However, phones can die or get damaged — KOPILOT.ID won’t. In certain circumstances, that could make the difference between life and death for outdoor athletes.

“We built KOPILOT.ID for people who love big days outside — and want the peace of mind that comes with being prepared,” Justin Bradshaw, co-founder of KOPILOT.ID, said in a press release.

KOPILOT.ID Features

(Photo/KOPILOT.ID)

The KOPILOT.ID does not require a subscription or batteries to work. It does not require a cell service connection, so it should always function, regardless of where you’re wearing it.

Users can attach it to helmets, packs, jackets, or goggles. Your purchase includes a goggle mount, zipper mount, and carbon helmet mount. The brand says it’s lightweight, waterproof, and durable. It can handle getting banged up in mud, dirt, or water, in both hot and cold conditions.

If you are in a foreign country, the device can even utilize AI to translate your information into 24 languages.

The Breck Epic is a 6-day mountain bike race held outside of Breckenridge, Colo. Competitors must complete six loops over the course of the race. Each loop is between 35 and 50 miles long, following the trail system that spiderwebs the mountains between Summit and Park Counties.

Annually, around 500 riders compete in the Breck Epic, and in 2026, every one of them will be wearing a KOPILOT.ID as an added layer of safety. It will be the first organized race to use the product, although it almost certainly won’t be the last.

“We build the Breck Epic around risk, reward, and camaraderie,” Mike McCormack, race director for the Breck Epic, said in a press release. “Adding KOPILOT.ID to our toolkit is an investment in protecting that spirit. When things go sideways, whether mechanical, medical, or otherwise, the last thing a racer should worry about is accessing help. This gives them one less thing to fear.”

Midland’s ER310PRO Is Its Most Advanced Emergency Weather Radio to Date

Emily Pennington — Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:37:53 +0000

Whether you’re the type of adventurer who spends loads of time recreating in the backcountry or someone who lives in a rural area that’s prone to big weather events, you likely already know the importance of having reliable and trustworthy safety gear in your arsenal. If the power suddenly goes out or you’re awaiting news of a gnarly impending storm, you’ll want an emergency radio with great battery life to keep you and your family informed with up-to-the-minute information.

Thankfully, Midland’s all-new ER310PRO radio is here to ease some nerves, offering a powerful suite of features (like Bluetooth streaming and NOAA weather alerts) for outdoor lovers who value safety and preparedness.

This high-tech device takes one of the company’s bestsellers, the ER310 Emergency Crank Weather Radio, and adds on a bevy of new upgrades, designed with the modern adventurer in mind. As such, it’s an essential safety tool for intrepid humans of all stripes, whether you’re on a week-long off-the-grid hunting trip or awaiting news of a tornado warning in your family cabin.

Let’s get into what makes this new addition to Midland’s radio lineup so exciting.

(Photo/Midland)

Meet the ER310PRO Portable Emergency Crank Weather Radio

As we mentioned, the ER310PRO builds off one of Midland’s most trusted emergency weather radios and tacks on loads of additional features. These capabilities include multiple charging options and an extended battery life of up to 200 hours, which is over three times the power of the original ER310.

It also includes critical functionality, such as the ability to receive official NOAA weather alerts. The radio is compact enough to stash in your vehicle, in case of an unexpected weather catastrophe, yet powerful enough to keep in your home or backcountry hut to stay up-to-date on any recently issued weather warnings.

The Specs

The ER310PRO is a powerful machine, with Bluetooth streaming capability from a phone or mobile device, so you can stream emergency broadcasts even if traditional communications systems go down. This new feature is a sweet bonus, because it also allows the speakers to stream your favorite music when you’re not in an emergency scenario.

This portable AM/FM radio also has the ability to receive real-time NOAA weather alerts, using its up-to-200-hour lithium-ion battery life to continue updating your crew long after smartphone batteries have died.

A built-in Cree LED flashlight helps illuminate your space at night if the power’s out. The ER310PRO’s onboard power bank offers super-fast bidirectional charging, making it easy to keep smaller devices, like an iPhone or tablet, at full battery capacity. An included ultrasonic dog whistle in the unit may also assist rescue teams in locating your group in an extreme emergency.

Lastly, multiple power options make it easy to keep the ER310PRO going much longer than its base-level 200 hours of battery life. An attached solar panel can recharge the device when it’s placed into direct sunlight, and a built-in hand crank can add quick power boosts at night if you’re left without electricity. Between off-grid trips or big weather events, you can quickly recharge the ER310PRO using its lightning-fast USB-C connection port.

(Photo/Midland)

Features You’ll Love

Extended battery life: An upgraded lithium-ion battery boasts three times more power than previous models, providing up to 200 hours of radio use.
Compact size: Small dimensions of 8.1 x 2.8 x 3.4 inches and a lightweight profile of just 1.3 pounds make it easy to bring the ER310PRO on all your adventures.
Onboard power bank offers quick, bi-directional charging for small devices, like phones and tablets.
NOAA weather alerts: Get real-time emergency and safety notifications from the National Weather Service, whether it’s a wildfire, tornado, or hurricane.
Multiple power options keep the ER310PRO charged and ready. Choose between a fast-charging USB-C port, hand crank, and solar panel so that you’re always informed and ready to go.
Bluetooth compatible: Stream your favorite music, podcasts, or trusted emergency broadcasts, should traditional radio communications not be available.

SHOP ER310PRO NOW

(Photo/Midland)

This post was sponsored by Midland.

I Let a Headband Hack My Brain for Better Sleep (I Think It Worked): ‘Elemind’ Sleep Headband Review

Rachelle Schrute — Mon, 10 Nov 2025 23:26:19 +0000

If I’d seen this thing a few years ago, I’d have laughed. A headband that listens to your brain and uses your brainwaves to nudge you toward sleep sounds like a plot point from a bad sci-fi movie.

Good sleep fixes more than good coffee ever could. It sharpens focus, speeds recovery, and makes long days in the field or at a desk less miserable. When a company claimed it could improve all that by tuning into my brain waves, I was — to put it mildly — skeptical.

Elemind’s Sleep Headband uses neurostimulation to guide the brain toward natural sleep rhythms. The idea comes from research at MIT and promises to help users fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer. That was bold enough to deserve a fair test.

I wore the headband for a few months at home, in the backcountry, in the air, and on the road. I wanted to see if this little gadget could actually improve recovery sleep for outdoor athletes, jet-lagged humans, and anyone else who struggles to turn their brain off at night. To say I had serious doubts would be an understatement.

In short: My doubts might have been wrong. The Elemind Sleep Headband ($349) really does seem to deliver measurable improvement in sleep recovery, although the cost and daily charging might make it hard to justify for everyone. If you’re a tech-hungry gadget lover who loves data points and a good night’s sleep, it might be exactly what you need to add to your nightstand.

Elemind Sleep Headband Review

7.8

Specifications

Price: $349
Weight: 2.3 oz.
Battery Life: Up to 8 hours (requires daily charging)
Charging: USB-C
Sensors: EEG neurofeedback sensors
Connectivity: Bluetooth with companion app (iOS and Android)
Materials: Soft stretch fabric

Pros

Consistent improvement in falling asleep faster
Comfortable and lightweight
Research-backed technology
Simple setup and easy-to-use app

Cons

Requires daily charging
Results vary by user

How It Works

(Photo/Rachelle Schrute)

Elemind reads your brain’s electrical activity in real time and responds with gentle tones that align with your natural brain-wave patterns. The goal is to help your mind settle into the slower, synchronized rhythms that lead to sleep.

The process, called “closed-loop neurostimulation,” listens to your brain and adjusts as you drift off. This concept has been used in medical research for conditions such as epilepsy and ADHD, but Elemind has applied it to sleep.

The company’s early clinical trials, conducted in partnership with the MIT McGovern Institute for Brain Research, show measurable reductions in the time it takes participants to fall asleep. The studies are small, but the results are consistent enough to suggest that the science holds water.

Testing the Elemind

The Elemind system consists of two parts: the headband itself and, of course, an app. I tested the Elemind headband for a few months under real-world conditions, both at home and while traveling for hunting and fishing trips. Most nights, I wore the headband and let it track my sleep while I verified the data with a Coros Nomad watch and a random, generic smart ring.

All the devices showed fairly similar tracking and results when it came to my sleep quality, time falling asleep, and frequency of waking, giving me a bit more confidence that the numbers weren’t being fluffed.

The Experience

(Photo/Rachelle Schrute)

Starting a “session” with the Elemind is cake. Press the power button, open the app, and adjust the band until the sensors rest against your forehead. Once connected, it plays a soft rainfall-like sound the bone conduction that shifts in subtle patterns as it tracks your brain activity. Beneath that steady rain are faint, fuzzy tones that change in response to your brain waves.

Honestly, it seems almost silly when you first use it.

The volume can be adjusted via two + or – buttons. You’re supposed to set it so it’s just barely audible, just enough to notice without being distracting. And because it’s played through bone conduction, your bedmate(s) won’t even notice.

The Elemind app is very streamlined, simple, and pretty user-friendly, though maybe a bit basic; (photo/Elemind)

The sound feels somewhat soothing and natural, almost like distant weather, and after a few minutes, it blends into the background while your mind starts to quiet. Most of the nights, I didn’t even have time to really analyze the sounds. I put it on, hit the button, and I was out. To be fair, of all the things I’m good at, I’m really good at sleeping.

After it senses that you’ve gone to sleep, the feedback starts to fade away and eventually turns off. If you wake up in the middle of the night and need to go back to sleep, you can hit the button, and feedback will start playing again.

I don’t like sleeping with gadgets, so I expected not to like wearing this thing on my melon. However, it’s incredibly soft and super light, so I didn’t even really notice it. I sleep on my back, side, belly, and in random pretzel configurations, and it didn’t bother me a bit.

My Results

Just a few examples of my results, showing incredibly fast and solid sleep; (photo/Rachelle Schrute)

The results weren’t dramatic, but they were recordable and noticeable. On average, my time to fall asleep decreased, and I was able to return to sleep faster after waking. The consistency of that result was what stood out most.

For comparison, I also tested my usual fallback method: a white noise playlist on Spotify. It helped, but not nearly as fast or consistently. The Elemind produced a quicker, more reliable transition into sleep, while the playlist seemed to have larger variation in the time it took me to doze off, depending on the day, my fatigue, and where my head was at.

On nights when I went without the Elemind or the white noise, my time to fall asleep was even more varied and stretched out.

On nights I was wearing the Elemind, my time to fall asleep was typically around 10-15 minutes faster than the playlist nights, and I entered REM sleep more quickly.

So, did I notice a difference? Yes and no. In this day and age, feeling truly rested is a joke, right?

What I can say is that I noticed I wasn’t reaching for my phone to occupy my time while lying in bed. When I did wake up in the middle of the night, I wasn’t stirring for the next hour.

Did I feel more rested? I’m not sure. I just know my time spent trying to will myself to sleep seemed to decrease drastically. I take that to mean I am more rested, whether I actively recognize it or not.

A Bit More of the Science Behind Elemind and Sleep Recording

A figure from Elemind’s published study; (photo/Elemind)

Elemind uses EEG sensors to measure your brain’s electrical activity as you fall asleep. Those sensors detect the small voltage changes that happen when your brain shifts between wakefulness and rest. The system identifies when your brain is still producing the faster alpha waves that keep you alert, and then plays faint tones timed to encourage the slower theta and delta waves tied to deeper sleep.

The tones don’t knock you out or override your thoughts. They act more like a quiet cue, helping your brain follow the same rhythm it naturally takes when you start to drift.

Elemind’s research shows that this process shortens the time it takes most users to fall asleep and can improve overall sleep quality. The results depend on proper sensor placement and consistent use, but when everything connects as it should, the science holds steady and the effect feels natural.

My results aligned with those findings, even if the numbers were modest. I didn’t experience a life-changing transformation, but I did wake up feeling better rested more often. In the world of recovery, small gains are still gains worth chasing.

Who This Thing Is For

(Photo/Elemind)

Elemind is for anyone who treats rest as part of their training plan or for anyone just looking for better sleep. It fits athletes, hunters, and travelers who rely on recovery to perform well and stay sharp. It also works for people who can’t seem to shut their minds off once the lights go out.

If you already use a smartwatch, smart ring, or other sleep tracker, Elemind fits neatly into that system. It’s a quiet, data-backed way to make sleep come easier and recovery be more reliable. And if you hate wearing sleep wearables (like I do), this is definitely more comfortable than sleeping with a watch on or other tracker.

Drawbacks

Power Draw

The daily charging gets old fast. The battery lasts one night, which means you’ll need to plug it in every day for it to fully charge for your night’s sleep. Forget once, and the whole routine falls apart.

For something built to make sleep effortless, the constant need to have it charging is a pain, particularly when traveling. When it comes to use in an outdoor setting, that might make it just too much of a pain to make sense when packing for camp.

Effectiveness

Another thing to note is that the company itself found that the device only seemed to work on 76% of people in clinical trials. The remaining 24% saw little to no benefit. The company theorizes that this is likely because the system depends on proper sensor placement, steady contact, and consistent brain-wave activity to trigger the response. It works well when everything aligns, but it isn’t guaranteed for everyone.

Cleanliness

Not being able to thoroughly clean this thing is a real concern. You can’t toss the Elemind into the wash, and the company only recommends wiping it down with a damp cloth and mild soap.

For something made mostly of fabric that sits against your forehead all night, that feels less than ideal. Sweat, skin oil, and whatever else your face produces will build up fast. Trading clear skin for a few extra minutes of sleep might not be the upgrade most people want.

The Bottom Line

(Photo/Elemind)

Elemind’s Sleep Headband really seems to work, is comfortable, and is rooted in what seems to be pretty credible science. It consistently helped me fall asleep faster and wake up feeling more recovered. However, it’s also pretty expensive (compared to ripping through a white noise playlist) and demands daily charging, which can become frustrating for us outdoor folks.

For athletes and hard-charging travelers who treat recovery like training, it’s certainly worth considering. For casual sleepers or anyone skeptical of brain-wave tech, that playlist might still be just enough.

VERO X-Realtree Tide Tracker Review: Time and Tide With Affordable Elegance

Steve Graepel — Fri, 07 Nov 2025 23:10:10 +0000

True confession. I’m a mainlander living in a mountain state, and I’m reviewing a tide tracking watch. But I’m also an Oregonian expat who makes a yearly pilgrimage home, introducing the coast of my youth to my own child. Brackish water pumps deep in the veins.

Being an inlander unplugs you from coastal time. It’s a gap of intuition, a broken circadian clock that fails to grasp the basics of when high or low tide rolls in or out. Locals have it. I no longer do. And I’ve spent time (and money) on beaches in Oregon, Washington, and far corners of Alaska without Wi-Fi, where I’ve paid the price without the knowledge.

While not the same as visiting the sea, the VERO X-Realtree Tide Tracker does quench a bit of my thirst for the ebb and flow of the ocean.

In short: Handsome, durable, and functional, VERO just released its X-Realtree Tide Tracker ($550). It’s a capable tool watch with unique tide tracking functionality you won’t commonly find in the analog watch market, especially at this price.

Compare the VERO X-Realtree Tide Tracker with the best field watches.

7.3